Tag: Piers Morgan

The idiocy of gun control summed up in very short order II

Oh Piers Morgan and his anti-firearm fanaticism

Over the weekend a church in Florida posted a sign letting maniacs know they are not a soft-target, which of course sent Morgan into a self-righteous tizzy.

It is called self-defense Piers and yes armed citizens are a deterrent, unlike gun free zones, which are a magnet for mass killers. But, PIers, Piers, Piers you ignorant ass, you could not stop at the edge of the idiot poo could you? Of course not

Ben Shapiro tried to talk sense to Piers, but………..

And Piers did not stop there

Incoherent thoughts anyone? Wanna know why I coined the term Cult of Gun Control? Brainwashed buffoons like Piers Morgan!

Noted Douche Bag Piers Morgan still a Douche Bag!

Limey Bastard!

Via Daily Mail:

…I vividly remember another part of our interview, where I played you a video of your daughter Chiara talking about you, and saying she was so happy that you weren’t ‘some boring white guy who didn’t know what he was talking about.’ She added: ‘Dad cares about everyone in this city, rich, poor, black, white, blue whatever, and that’s what we need.’

She was right. You are what New York needs. It’s one of the most multi-cultural cities on earth, and with your black wife and two black children, you are perfectly placed to understand and articulate the particular issues such a multi-cultural society creates.

So don’t apologise for spelling out the reality of the Eric Garner case.

It was an incident that shamed the NYPD, shamed New York, and shamed America.

It was also another clear message to New York’s black community that you have to be very careful when interacting with certain rogue members of the NYPD. To pretend otherwise is to ignore what we all saw on that hideous video.

A disturbing New York Daily News investigation last month revealed that at least 179 people have been killed by the NYPD in the last 15 years.
Where race was known, 86% were either black or Hispanic.

27% of those killed were unarmed.

The stats don’t lie.

The abuse that you’re now facing is a small price to pay for being right, Mr Mayor.

Don’t be a boring white guy. That’s not why you were elected.

Kind regards
Piers Morgan

Hey Piers! This is from all of us, you steaming pile of camel dung

r694

 

Marc Lamont Hill is today’s Marxist Moron

I often use the expression “educated beyond their hat size” to illustrate how idiotic some people are. Marc Lamont Hill is a perfect example of this expression!

The background to this transcript is that Piers Morgan dared to tell the truth

The reason for his bad day centered around Janet Mock, a transgender woman he’d had as a guest on his program to discuss her new book Redefining Realness: My Path to Womanhood, Identity, Love & So Much More. That’s right, he was helping her sell her book. But that wasn’t enough for Mock. She really wants to sell her book. So a week after the interview was taped, she incited people in the transgender community, who accused Morgan of being “transphobic” and mistreating her by explaining that she was male before age 18. The fact is, Mock was born a boy with the name “Charles” and had a sex change at 18. Her beef is that she “identified” as a woman her whole life. And yet, she still had a penis.

During the interview, Piers told her that her dress was something Beyoncé would wear. Mock replied, “Well, I live for Beyoncé. So that’s a very good compliment. Thank you.” Piers complimented Mock repeatedly throughout the segment, calling her “brave” and “gutsy” and a “remarkable lady.” Instead of being treated like a zoo animal who is fed his part, Morgan asked questions he thought viewers would wonder about. For example, asking his audience how they might feel if they learned a woman they were dating was once a dude? Hardly an outlandish question to ask in reference to a transgender woman who is selling a book about her life experiences. But that was not in Mock’s talking points. She wanted Piers to normalize her experience and speak to her as if she wasn’t selling her book based on the fact that she is a transgender. Would the book even exist had she not been born with a penis? OF COURSE NOT. If we wanted a sanitized, publicist’s version of an interview, fine. But that wasn’t the case, nor should it have been

In short he SAID that this woman WAS a boy until she had surgery to change her gender. But that truth caused a case of offendeditis that this idiot Marc Lamont Hill obviously contracted

Via Newsbusters:

MARC LAMONT HILL: …[F]or me Piers, the bigger issue isn’t the use of language. It’s the fact that so much of the interview centered around the sensational aspects –  about genitalia. There’s so much more about trans life, trans experience, that I wanted you to cover….

MORGAN: No, wait a minute – wait a minute, okay?…I never mentioned her genitalia at all ever in either interview. You’re the first to mention. I didn’t mention this.

HILL: Well, when you say – well, look, you alluded to it when we talk about – if you talk about surgery and when you talk about saying a boy until 18. It implies that she – her womanhood is attached to surgeries-

AMY HOLMES: She had surgery!

BEN FERGUSON: She was a boy!

HILL: That was a very dangerous point-

FERGUSON: She was a boy!…

HILL: Trans identity does not hinge upon surgery. You can have a penis and still be a woman – a trans-woman. That’s the point.

See? Facts are “dangerous” somehow if they offend the easily offended. The point about Janet Mock is this, no one gives a you-know-what that she is now a woman, was a boy, had surgery, or any of it! But she is a “victim” because Piers Morgan brought up her story of being a man who became a woman. A story that Janet Mock wrote a book about! What madness is this? Madness that noted buffoon Marc Lamont Hill, who gets on TV to comment on issues despite his glaring lack of any sense, defends. Damn where is my aspirin?

FINALLY! Piers Morgan’s name associated with something good

Gotta love the gumption of a certain Oklahoma lawmaker

Via Fox 25:

A State Senator has filed legislation that he says would ‘reaffirm Oklahomans’ Second Amendment rights’ by not requiring law-abiding citizens to obtain a gun license.

State Sen. Nathan Dahm filed Senate Bill 1473, or what he calls the “Piers Morgan Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms Without Infringement Act”.

The bill proposes to allow citizens over the age of 18 to open carry loaded or unloaded guns without a license for hunting and target shooting. The bill would also cover military or law enforcement functions; for practice or performance for entertainment purposes; or for lawful self-defense purposes.

“The Second Amendment says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and yet when we require our citizens to jump through hoops, pay fees and undergo a process that presumes they’re guilty of something until proven otherwise, their rights are being infringed upon,” Dahm said in a press release.  “Senate Bill 1473 simply says Oklahomans can carry firearms in all the places currently allowed by law, but they will no longer be required to obtain a license to do so.”

Piers, of course, cannot grasp the ideals of true liberty. But, I do have one question about the law. Does it do away with concealed carry laws? Or would Oklahomans have to go through the same process to carry a firearm? Apparently, not

It would also be allowed for events related to military or law-enforcement functions; for practice or performance for entertainment purposes; or for lawful self-defense purposes. Places where guns are currently prohibited, such as schools and government facilities, would continue to be off-limits for firearms.

“Oklahomans will still be able to get a license so they could carry in other states that allow reciprocity,” Dahm said. “They just won’t have to have a license in Oklahoma to carry.”

Someone give Sean Penn my address please

Penn, the ultimate useful idiot  says that Obama should issue an executive order committing Ted Cruz and the Tea Party.

Actor and activist Sean Penn said Monday that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tx.) and other Tea Partiers in Congress need to be committed by executive order.

Such was said to a laughing Piers Morgan on the CNN program bearing his name

SEAN PENN: It is funny, because what you were talking about before we went to the break, you know, I, I was in Port-au-Prince when the shutdown happened. And, and I said to people — they need, I had stuff that it was demanding on me in Port-au-Prince but I, I had to come home. I said, “Listen I, I have to leave Haiti now because I have to travel to the third world county that I come from.”

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: [Laughs]

You have been, you know, this I think, you know, on the forefront of this gun thing. All of these things, and this is also where you get people who think these things.

I think for let’s, let’s go to the Tea Party influence on Congress on this thing. I think they have, there’s a mental health problem in Congress. This would be solved by committing them by executive order, I think, because these our American brothers and sisters. We shouldn’t be criticizing them, attacking them. We should take their — this is a cry for help.

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: You literally commit what …

PENN: I think …

MORGAN: … people like Ted Cruz?

PENN: He’s, he’s my American brother. I want, we think, we should take care of him. He’s in trouble.

MORGAN: [Laughs] Well, actually have him committed.

PENN: Yeah, I thinks it’s a good idea.

MORGAN: [Laughs]

PENN: [Laughs] But then you look at, you know, the, look, there’s a lot of reason to take a shot at me and I’m giving people a lot reason to over the years. But the thing you’re talking about and, and the way people’s perception of political positions are, is a direct reaction to their lack of, of their education which is a huge problem that we’re dealing with in the country. And between an uneducated people and the solipsism of the people like Ted Cruz and their party, it’s a poisonous thing.

Good grief, there is indeed an education problem, and it is retarding the mental health of idiots like Penn. People who refuse to understand that Marxism does not work. But, tell you what Sean why don’t you start by ringing my doorbell. See how that works out for you. Let us see what happens when a Marxist troll confronts a patriot who loves America, OK Sean? But, of course Penn might be stupid, but he ain’t that stupid.

 

Maybe Piers Morgan should be talking about PC instead of obsessing over AR-15’s

How pathetic is our media? A mad man goes on a murderous rampage, killing 12 people, and the media’s first quest seems to be what kind of gun he used. And while they got that story wrong, largely because of their obsession with demonizing the AR-15, which is just a rifle, they continue to miss the politically correct elephant in the room. Powerline does not miss the most obvious question. How in the Hell did Aaron Alexis ever get security clearance?

According to reports, Alexis was arrested in Seattle in 2004 for shooting out the tires of a parked car. Apparently, he did so in a rage because he felt two construction workers had disrespected him.

The Seattle police said today that it referred Alexis’ case to the Seattle Municipal Court for charges of property damage and discharge of a firearm. But there’s no indication that Alexis was ever prosecuted. And a spokesperson for the Seattle City Attorney’s Office claims that it never received the report from police and so did not review the matter for possible charges.

If Alexis had been prosecuted and convicted, I don’t know that he would have gone to jail. But in a healthy, properly functioning society, he would have served time. And he certainly wouldn’t have walked due to faulty paperwork.

But let’s take Alexis’ situation one step further. If Alexis been convicted of discharging a firearm in public, prospective employers who conduct background checks (including, presumably, the Navy) would likely have learned of the conviction. Given the obvious threat posed by someone who shoots guns at cars because he feels disrespected, rational employers would have refused to hire Alexis.

But the civil rights community and the EEOC are inclined to sue employers whose criminal background check policies exclude black applicants in disproportionate numbers, which most such policies do. As an African-American, Alexis could have been a plaintiff in a private suit or a claimant in a government suit.

Gee I wonder why the media is spending less time asking about how he got the job and security clearance than about the weapon he used. Oh yes, narrative!