For National Offend a Feminist Week, here is this
RS McCain continues his National Offend a Feminist Week by laying bare the deep insanity that IS today’s Feminism
“It became obvious that men didn’t want to interact with me or with women in general on an equal level, and that what ‘attracted’ them in women was subordination to them — as soon as we wanted to be their ‘equals’ they were repelled by it, lost interest or tried to thwart the feminist drive in me some way or another.”
I hate to break it to this demented woman, but men WANT, I mean REALLY want women that are their equals. The fact is women who always want to do whatever a guy wants to do is, well boring. So, I doubt this Feminist had man problems because she was too “equal”. A more likely version is that she was a gigantic pain in the ass with her fierce Feminist act.. I mean let’s be honest here, no guy, at least no sane guy, wants to date anyone that talks like this
Just a few days ago I read Skulldrix’s post on a separatist state of mind, which I have found very refreshing and enlightening, and which brought me back to many of my own first experiences of separatism. I remember some conversations going on at FCM’s on separatism, maybe a year and a half ago, where several of us bloggers and commenters discussed whether we should call ourselves separatists or pro-separatists. FCM at the time argued that separatism wasn’t a realistic or feasible goal for most women under patriarchy because the reality is that we can’t completely escape men, so it would be more realistic to envision ourselves as pro-separatist instead of separatists.
I can’t quite remember what I wrote at the time or whether I expressed myself clearly but I thought that the distinction between pro-sep and sep was unnecessary once we conceive of it as a way of being, an ongoing journey and struggle, according to the means we have and what is safe for our survival. Though I agree about the fact that most if not all of us can’t escape men on a daily basis. Most women will have to work alongside men to some degree because that’s the only or least worst job opportunity we can find. Very often we will have to depend on men to learn a skill, or to heal from severe illnesses, because men monopolise and control all disciplines and sectors of their society.
See what I mean? Who the fuck talks like that? A crazy person that’s who! The problem Feminists have with men is NOT men, it is the Feminists constant rage-a-thon, and constant quest to be a victim of the “Patriarchy”. So maybe your man problems are not the “Patriarchy” at all. Maybe the whole “I am a victim” act is really not very fun. You want to know what your problem is? Find the nearest mirror!
Stacy has more on Radical Wind and her RAGE!
Radical feminists are both (a) insane and (b) basically correct in their understanding of the psychology of sex. Which is to say, a careful study of what is today called “gender theory” does show that inequality between men and women — collectively, under the systematic male dominance that feminists call patriarchy — is inextricably linked to heterosexuality. Even if every conceivable reform were enacted that could rid women of discrimination in education or employment, male dominance would continue to be expressed through sexual intercourse, through manipulation or abuse within relationships, through pregnancy and through women’s greater burden in parenthood. Women who desire long-term male romantic companionship of any kind must do what is necessary first to attract, and then to maintain, his sexual interest.
Radical Wind — the wacko feminist whose rant “PIV is always rape, OK?” inspired widespread mockery – is actually very close to an important truth when she describes how men were “repelled” by her “feminist drive.” We may suppose she was hanging out with a loutish crew of young left-wing idiots when she experienced this; therefore it must have been a shocking revelation when these allegedly egalitarian men expected her to enact the “subordination” of femininity.
News flash: Men are men.
Bingo! Men are men, and women are women, and Feminists are CRAZY!
If you listen closely, you can, I think, hear the walrus say he wants EXTRA mustard on his sandwich
The inventor of N.O.A.F.W. RS McCain, kicks off this momentous week, which I sometimes call Make Me a Sandwich Week kicks it if with the madness of Amanda Marcotte!
Feminism is, among other things, a totalitarian attempt to tell us what to think by controlling what we are allowed to say. For example, we cannot be permitted to disapprove of promiscuous women, and so the language of disapproval must be suppressed.
The “walk of shame” is a slang term that usually describes a person, usually a woman, who is making her way home from spending the night at someone else’s house for a sexual encounter.
The iconic image of a woman doing the walk of shame is disheveled hair and party-ready clothes that look sadly comical in the cold light of day. But it’s not her appearance that makes her trot home one of “shame.” No, as far as most people who use the phrase, her “shame” is that her appearance lets everyone know that she probably had sex, and for some reason, she is supposed to be ashamed of that.
“Walk of shame” is a phrase that’s widely understood to have originated on college campuses, since people who spent the night at a lover’s place often do have to walk on foot home to their own place, and usually in front of other people who recognize them and might recognize that their clubbing clothes don’t exactlymatch the casual wear that’s more common for mornings on campus. It’s expanded since then to encompass urban dwellers who often travel on foot or by public transportation and, in fact, has become so ubiquitous that you’ll often hear people who get to drive home say they were taking the walk of shame. (Drive of shame?)
But while the “walk” part of the phrase is understood flexibly, in many ways the “shame” part isn’t. . . .
You can read the whole absurdly censorious thing. Here we are, on the eve of sixth annual National Offend a Feminist Week, and Amanda Marcotte decides to give us a lecture on the need to remove “shame” from the dictionary insofar as refers to sluts, tramps, hussies, floozies, man-traps, wenches, trollops and Women of Dubious Virtue?
Are we not to describe such women as “easy,” “cheap” or “loose”? Do the Enlightened Arbiters of Acceptable Discourse mean to banish from our lexicon every possible synonym for “promiscuous”? Can we no longer be allowed to remark that the dolled-up bimbo making goo-goo eyes at every man in the bar is hot to trot, on the prowl, looking for some quick action and down to fuck?
Well, it’s still more than four hours before midnight EDT, but I can wait no more: National Offend a Feminist Week begins early!
Take that, you dirty lowdown harlots!
Let the festivities begin!
And their place, under Feminuts Doctrine is on the Plantation of Accepted Liberal Ideas, where any view point can be proudly expressed. As long as it is approved by Liberals of course! Now what does this mean? Well it means that only certain women are deemed fit by Leftist Feminuts. Here is a quick checklist
An “approved woman” must vehemently embrace abortion on demand. No pro-life views are welcomed or tolerated! Remember that unless a woman is aborting her baby, she is not really free!
An “approved woman” firmly holds fast to Liberal ideology on every issue, or else!
An “approved woman” never celebrates icky things like marriage, which is really just rape after all, or giving birth, because a baby in the womb is just a parasite anyway.
An “approved woman” only makes those lifestyle choices that are pre-approved by Feminuts like Amanda Marcotte. Remember ladies you can do anything you wish, as long as the Feminuts grant you permission of course!
Unapproved lifestyle choices include being a Conservative, a Republican, anything except a Democrat, being attractive to men, liking being attractive, and smiling, remember womyn are OPPRESSED so look angry all the time! Also under no circumstances whatsoever should a woman like to make men happy, or enjoy cooking, housework, or raising kids. And, of course no posing for any type pf photo shoot that might appeal to men! And working at Hooters, known as the Seventh Circle of Hell to Feminists is STRICTLY prohibited!
More Feminist Offending greatness via Matt who posts THIS OFFENSIVELY OFFENSIVE picture at The Conservative Hideout! Outrageously outrageous outrage from Feminuts in 3,2,1….
Today, I figured I would bring you some of the posts other bloggers are doing to honor Stacy McCain’s N.O.A.F.W
Zion’s Trumpet has this classic! It is sure to bring most any Feminist to the edge of her broom
Get That Woman out there where she belongs – cooking your dinner and looking good!
Wyblog reminds us that Feminists hate boys, just like they hate men!
That Mr. G Guy has enough material that is guaranteed to offend any Feminist!
Stacy McCain himself has the dangers the over sensitivity that Feminists wish to force upon us all
Please join us as we seek to expose the radicals posing as genuine Feminists. Genuine Feminists actually care about women. The Gals at NOW and their ilk? They care about their own power, and they use women as pawns.