Tag: Juan

Michelle Malkin uses Juan Williams as an intellectual punching bag again

Michelle rocks, God bless her, but Juan is pathetic. Seriously, some Conservatives give him some slack because NPR fired him and he spoke out against PC a bit. But, again, he is an empty suit, and one of the biggest wastes of air time I can imagine. Anyway, I always enjoy watching Michelle devastate Williams, so here it is, via Donald Douglas

How pissed is Michelle during this exchange? And who can blame her, listening to Juan Williams babble about “politicizing” the hearings. Really? Team Obama politicizes everything, and Juan shakes his head in approval, but if anyone dares seek the truth, Williams accuses them of playing politics. Good grief how doe she look at himself in the mirror?


I think Juan Williams MIGHT need some Kleenex, he is today’s Marxist Moron

Juan Williams gets cut some slack, by some because Fox hired him. But, frankly, we ought not need reminding how Liberal Juan is. Frankly, I have never forgiven the little whiner for calling Confederate soldiers Nazis. What an asshat, and historical illiterate he is! But Juan let his race baiting side-show in a recent GOP debate. You might remember it, he kept whining about  how it was MLK Day, while asking Perry, Romney, and Newt loaded gotcha questions taken from the Race Pimps Bible.

Well, little Juan is not over the intellectual spanking he received that night. And he has reverted to full blown Leftist!

So a guy whose contract was terminated by NPR on a phony pretext for not toeing the liberal line enough, including writing a book (“Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America–and What We Can Do About It”) which indicted the modern civil-rights movement for, well, undermining Black America, now appears to want eliminate “Constitution” and “Founding Fathers” from the lexicon of Republican candidates — and possibly, it would appear, from political discussion in general — because, well, they’re racial code words. How ironic.

That is what Juan Williams outrageously claims in his latest column at the Hill today (bold is mine):

Two weeks ago at the Fox News/Wall Street Journal debate in Myrtle Beach, S.C., I asked each GOP presidential candidate some pointed questions about the racial politics that will play a big role in the presidential campaign.

Juan, the ONLY reason race will be an issue at all, is because of Liberal race baiters like you. It is sad, no pathetic that skin color means so much to you Juan.

Race is always a trigger in politics, but now a third of the nation are people of color — and their numbers are growing. With those minorities solidly in the Democratic camp and behind the first black president, the scene is set for a bonanza of racial politics.

A BONANZA? The ONLY people making race an issue, is, as usual, the Left Juan!

The language of GOP racial politics is heavy on euphemisms that allow the speaker to deny any responsibility for the racial content of his message. The code words in this game are “entitlement society” — as used by Mitt Romney — and “poor work ethic” and “food stamp president” — as used by Newt Gingrich. References to a lack of respect for the “Founding Fathers” and the “Constitution” also make certain ears perk up by demonizing anyone supposedly threatening core “old-fashioned American values.”

Certain ears perk up Juan? No, Liberal ears Juan. No one who has an ounce of common sense perk up their ears over the words Constitution or Founding Fathers Juan!

The code also extends to attacks on legal immigrants, always carefully lumped in with illegal immigrants, as people seeking “amnesty” and taking jobs from Americans.

Juan, you ignorant, hate-filled little man! The only people who lump all immigrants together are, say it with me Juan, LIBERALS like YOU! You do this, of course, in an attempt to paint Republicans as racists! Conservatives are rightly concerned with ILLEGAL immigration, but fully embrace LEGAL immigration Juan!

Good Freaking Grief how pathetic can the Left get?