Category: SEX!

The War on anatomy, biology, reason, and sanity rolls on

This is what happens when deranged people start defining things

America’s largest LGBTQ coalition composed an in-depth catalogue of non-binary sexuality that includes a couple new definitions of genitalia, because penis and/or vagina aren’t self explanatory nor sensitive enough for non binary individuals.

When “front hole” is the new PC replacement for vagina, things have taken a turn for the surreal.

Besides discussion of masturbation and easy-to-read charts on how to practice safe trans sex with “sex toys, strap ons, and prosthetics,” “Safer Sex For Trans Bodies” provides its most devious assualt on reality by providing a complete rework of the penis/vagina dichotomy.

Crazy yes, but just wait

HRC’s guide explains, “We use this word to talk about internal genitals, sometimes referred to as a vagina. A front hole may self-lubricate, depending on age and hormones.” Remember, only “sometimes” is it a “vagina.”

“Strapless” is another new definition, which is explained as “the word to describe the genitals of trans women who have not had genital reconstruction (or ‘bottom surgery’), sometimes referred to as a penis.” Strapless is the term for a man-going-woman who hasn’t gotten the full procedure done. Well, at least there’s a specific term for that, it would be weird if someone called it a penis.

Go read the rest at Newsbusters

Remember when I said the Left would weaponize #MeToo ?

No, I am not psychic, if I were would have won a very large lottery, and would be retired, living in a log cabin in Montana, or maybe Utah. No, you do not have to have special powers to predict what the left will do, because they are predictable. The left has latched onto causes and then weaponized them over and again. It is just what they do. So, no do not write and ask me to predict the future. But, if you want to understand the left……………

Behold!

“You look great,” said Don Marsh, the 80-year-old host of the radio show “St. Louis On the Air,” to recently retired St. Louis news anchor Karen Foss (75 years young) when she entered the studio for an interview. The two veteran journalists then went on to have this pleasant and collegial conversation aired by KWMU, National Public Radio’s St. Louis affiliate.

The next morning, Foss learned that Marsh, a St. Louis institution, was leaving St. Louis Pubic Radio. Why? Someone at the KWMU studio had overheard Marsh’s complimentary greeting to Foss, perceived it to be inappropriate, and tattled to the bosses. That’s right, a man telling a longtime friend whom he hadn’t seen in a while that she looked great was Not Okay.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that Marsh was summoned to a meeting by KWMU station manager Tim Eby. According to Eby, the exchange between Marsh and Foss was not central to the meeting, but Marsh tells a different story.

Marsh told the Post-Dispatch that a producer had complained about his greeting to Foss. He said he was called into a meeting with two managers before going on the air Wednesday, in which one of them said they wanted to ‘put this behind us.’

‘And I said, ‘Are you basically saying what I did was wrong?’’ Marsh said. He said the manager made a gesture with his hand ‘like it’s right on the edge. And I said, ‘That’s it, I’m done.’’

This is where we are headed folks. If we do not get a handle on how far out of reality the left is taking #MeToo, we are going to end up in a society where men (especially men) and women will be afraid to work together because INAPPROPRIATE! Don’t believe me? Look at what has happened to free thought and speech on college campuses. You really think the left will not take this that far, and then take it farther? You think one-size-fits-all rules on flirting/dating/complimenting the opposite sex will end any differently?

The Left is hijacking “sexual harassment” to make war on men, women, flirting, and relationships

Divide, divide, divide. Is there anything the Left does not try to divide us over? Is there anything, any cause they will not hijack and weaponize to tear down America? The answer, is easy, no, there is not! The Left has hijacked every noble cause, civil rights, equality for women, and now, they are coming for dating, flirting, and yes, due process! They intend to use sexual harassment as another wedge, issue in their war on America.

What started with Harvey Weinstein’s use of his position to, well, what powerful men have used positions of power for since there were positions of power, has now blown up. Seemingly every actress, and some actors have been victimized, harassed. Now women on Capitol Hill are accusing politicians like Al Franken of improper behavior. It seems that everyone in America has been harassed, or propositioned, or victimized, and all of these claims are leading to some very murky waters.

Sexual harassment is not good, not at all. Of course we agree on that, don’t we? Sure! Now if we could just agree on what is and is not harassment. Not everyone agrees because we are all different. Some people see simple flirting as harassment. of course, we can not even agree on what flirting is either. I had a girlfriend, that I worked with, who used to accuse me of flirting every time I talked to another woman at work. So, to her a man smiling to a female coworker, was flirting. Yes, she was a very jealous person, which is why our relationship lasted a very short time. But, her view of what was flirting was very real. 

The view of what is and is not harassment is very subjective. I used to work with a female bartender who was constantly smacking me on the ass. She was attractive, but she also smacked servers, of both genders (yes, there are only two genders) on the butts too. Occasionally I and others responded in kind. None of that was harassment, or was it? What if that woman runs for office one day and the media or some bloggers start digging into her past? Could she be painted as a serial harasser? Would her campaign be destroyed by Ass Smacking Gate? Maybe not, but what if she were a man? What if the same type of behavior, consensual behavior, went on in his past? 

Now, anyone who has worked in the restaurant business knows is that touching happens a lot. The kitchen area where the food is run from is usually tight. And there is a lot of close physical contact. Is that harassment too? Some people would not be comfortable with such working conditions, and would go to a different job. But, is being uncomfortable that same as being harassed? To me, no, to some maybe so? You can see how messy this can get can’t you?

But the debate over workplace harassment is being turned into a wedge issue right now. Take Roy Moore, who I have never been the biggest fan of, and Al Franken, who I think is a disgrace to the Senate. They are both accused of “inappropriate behavior”.  Do I know what these men did? Well, Franken tried to kiss Leeann Tweeden years ago, and took a picture pretending to fondle her breasts while she slept  during a USO tour. Franken has also been accused of other incidents or groping and many are saying he must resign. 

Apparently Moore dated 17 to 19-year-old women when he was 30-32. That was not all that uncommon forty years ago. Now the accusations that Moore sexually assaulted a 14-year-old are obviously very serious, but so are the accusations that this is simply a smear campaign. So, we have is a he said she said situation. The Left, however is pushing the notion that idea that we must believe the woman, because women “never lie” about such things. Anyone who does not wish to destroy due process or throw out the American principle of innocent proven guilty is now defending sexual assault or “blaming the victim”. Mike McDaniel writes about this and the inevitable consequences

Now, we discover–apart from being privileged, supreme and manfully toxic–the mere accusation of a clumsy pass decades old is sufficient to destroy male reputations, careers, and potentially, to deny a legitimately won seat in the Congress. All such accusations have become “serious,” defining, and condemnatory, because all women must be believed. Some have gone so far as to suggest women never lie about something as grave as rape, a belief that has caused Rolling Stone Magazineno end of anxiety.  It also causes much sardonic laughter among honest, dedicated police officers, but they’re mostly extra-toxic males, so who listens to them? Having been one of them, and still carrying the baggage, I can attest that women do most certainly lie about rape, and pretty much everything else about which human beings can lie, but that’s just me being male again. Now I’m a teacher, which is similar to being a police officer in that everyone lies to you, but that’s a topic for another article. Women must be believed, even when they’re unbelievable–especially when they’re unbelievable, and double especially when they’re wearing pussy hats or dressed as vulva. What could bestow greater credibility than that?

Where does it end? There ain’t no end folks, as McDaniel explains

The whole thing is getting more and Moore confusing. Take the case of Roy Moore. He’s accused, by several women, of malicious dating, perhaps even a bit of–eeeuuuuw!–kissing. Where, gentle readers, do we draw the line on Congressional membership? If we knew the sexual urges, thoughts, and practices of our members of Congress, would we pretty much clean house (and Senate)? What is sufficiently disqualifying? Accusations of toe licking? Foot fetishes? A bit of light, consensual BDSM? Are breast men acceptable–not that any man is acceptable these days–but not butt or leg men? How about men that tell dopey jokes about women? And what do we do with men that enjoy viewing the naked female body? If the latter is the standard, whew! There goes masculinity, except on the coasts, on university campuses and in Congress, of course.

Ah yes, we must believe the women OR ELSE! And hey, even if the women are lying and even if a few men, even a left-wing US Senator get hurt in the process, oh well, right?

See? Let the war on men, flirting, etc. commence because SOCIAL JUSTICE! Lindin, and other leftists are very eager to sacrifice others to advance their twisted ideology! All that matters to the Left is the end goal, the means used to reach that goal? It is all good to them. And if, one day men are afraid to even look at a woman, talk to a woman, much less be attracted to her or ask her out, oh well, just remember it is all for the common good

Your Daley Weirdness-Vibrating Panties

Freaks!

You just may be a sex fiend when you are wearing a pair of “vibrating panties” while dining out at Cheddar’s and getting it on in a dressing room at Kohl’s.

Cheddars: Food so good you will scream!

Those are just two of the exotic sexual acts that led to the arrest of a kinky couple who had carved out a niche market in the amateur pornography business by selling homemade videos of them engaging in lurid sex acts in public places.

The Arkansas couple was arrested by authorities who received a tip that 30-year-old Leslie Sessions and 37-year-old Derek Calloway were making the videos in retail outlets and restaurants which they then sold to perverts who got off on watching sex in public.

Yes, America, the Left does wish to control your sex life

Leftism is about Collectivism and a big part of that is control, of everything

 The “right to privacy” when it came to the bedroom was the casus belli the Left used to upend social sexual mores and institute contrary values; the “right to privacy” when it came to sex was never the purpose, but solely the means. Now that the end of upsetting and recombobulating sexual norms has been achieved, “the right to privacy” when it comes to sexuality can be readily eschewed.

A case in point comes from a requirement that Clemson University tried to push that would have required students to list their sexual history, or be punished for refusing to do so.

“[T]he South Carolina university is asking students invasive and personal questions about their drinking habits and sex life as part of what they’ve billed as an online Title IX training course.

“‘How many times have you had sex (including oral) in the last 3 months?’ asks one question.

“‘With how many different people have you had sex (including oral) in the last 3 months?’ asks another.

When you wish to understand why the Left does certain things, remind yourself that Leftism is Collectivism, and Collectivism is about control!

Ecosexuals you say?

Good Freaking Grief William Teach has the line of the day, week, month, year

Mixing advocacy, gender confusion, and bat guano insanity

(Advocate) Over the past few years, some organizations and publications have added a Q, for queer, to the LGBT acronym — and now there are some who say we should add an E, for ecosexual.

The term has been around for much of the 21st century, although its definition can range from those who want to make environmental activism sexy and fun to those who derive sexual pleasure from interactions with nature. There are people who use sex products made from sustainable materials, enjoy hiking or swimming in the nude, or simply want to date other environmental activists, and others “who roll around in the dirt having an orgasm covered in potting soil” or “fuck trees, or masturbate under a waterfall,” Amanda Morgan, an ecosexual activist who teaches at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, told Vice recently.

When I tell y’all it is now impossible to parody the Left……………..

By the way, can trees give consent? I do not believe they can, sound slike Ecosexual privilege to me Moonbattery has more

LGBT is no longer considered sufficiently inclusive. Now we have LGBTIE, for “lesbian gay bisexual transsexual intersexual ecosexual.” The final E was evidently added at a pride fest in San Francisco last year. From the Ecosex Manifesto:

ecosexual-manifesto

OK! That is several floors below crazy on the Moonbat elevator, and, frankly, has ruined cucumbers for me. Is nothing sacred?

The manifesto goes on to proclaim that “ecosex is an identity.” So don’t you dare discriminate against people who enjoy having sex with knotholes or cucumbers by denying them hiring and promotion preference.

Again, Good Freaking Grief!

‘Transgender’ Conditioning Is ‘Child Abuse’ (Matt Barber)

‘Transgender’ Conditioning Is ‘Child Abuse’ – Matt Barber

.

.
George Orwell famously wrote, “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

For those tethered to biological reality, the self-evident truth that, prior to birth, people develop either “XY” or “XX” genetic markers and, as such, are objectively, and shall forever remain, either male or female, is as plain as blue is blue or pink is pink.

Indeed, notwithstanding the politically driven “LGBT” agenda that pretends otherwise, those who suffer with “gender dysphoria” disorder will stay, as born, either male or female, whether or not they play dress up, sterilize themselves and destroy healthy reproductive organs.

Hence, it’s of little surprise that, tragically, of those who put themselves through this imaginary “transition,” 41 percent will subsequently attempt suicide.

Still, this “progressive” socio-political scheme moves quickly from merely pitiable and delusional to ghastly and abusive when children are the targets – when selfish adults exploit sexually confused young people by feeding their “gender” delusion and pumping them full of dangerous hormones, or otherwise surgically mutilating and sterilizing them for life via so-called “gender reassignment surgery.”

In order to address the growing momentum of this harmful, gender-bending, pseudo-scientific quackery, a number of America’s leading medical experts on the subject have finally weighed in. “The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex. Facts – not ideology – determine reality,” they warn.

This child-health advocacy group has released a report that determines, among other things:

1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder.

“The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species,” they observe. “This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sexual differentiation (DSDs), including but not limited to testicular feminization and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognized as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.”

2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

Let’s take it a step further. The “gender” phenomenon is, in the larger sense, an artificial and anti-theist-tainted social construct. It’s an overt act of fist-shaking rebellion against the laws of nature and nature’s God.

And it’s dangerous.

Johns Hopkins Hospital was the pioneer in “gender reassignment surgery.” It now refuses to perform these discredited cosmetic procedures. Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the hospital’s former psychiatrist-in-chief and current distinguished service professor of psychiatry, is among those who participated in the ACPeds report. He has noted in the past that, as even the left-leaning APA reluctantly acknowledges, transgenderism is a “mental disorder” and that the idea of a “sex change” is “biologically impossible.” “People who identify as ‘feeling like the opposite sex’ or ‘somewhere in between’ do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women,” determines ACPeds.

3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking.

“When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such,” notes the report. “These children suffer from gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V). The psychodynamic and social learning theories of GD/GID have never been disproved.”

4. Puberty is not a disease, and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous.

“Reversible or not, puberty-blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child,” notes ACPeds.

5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98 percent of gender confused boys and 88 percent of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty.

And so what do we call a physician or a parent who takes a gender-confused boy, with a 98 percent chance of full recovery, and severely and irrevocably harms that child with dangerous hormones or sterilization surgery?

We should be calling them what they are: criminals.

To its credit, the ACPeds report goes on to identify this so-called “gender ideology” for exactly what it is: “Child abuse.”

6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer.

So much for the Hippocratic Oath: “Practice two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient.”

Gender ideology is anathema to good medicine and sound science.

7. Rates of suicide are 20 times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT–affirming countries.

“What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88 percent of girls and 98 percent of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?” the report asks.

8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse.

“Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to ‘gender clinics’ where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs. This, in turn, virtually ensures that they will ‘choose’ a lifetime of carcinogenic and otherwise toxic cross-sex hormones, and likely consider unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.”

There you have it. “Gender ideology” is child abuse – empirically and irrefutably. Isn’t it high time, at least where minors are concerned and as a matter of public policy, that we begin treating it as such?

If such abuse were associated with anything other than the “LGBQT” political special interests, we already would have.

.

.