Category: Left-Wing Hate

Then the Thugs came for the truth

What happens when we are afraid of using our rights? And, thus of speaking the truth?

Since the death of George Floyd and the nationwide protests that followed it, many athletes have used social media to express their feelings about the situation.

One of them, Falcons offensive tackle Kaleb McGary, took a stance he almost immediately regretted.

In a Twitter post, Atlanta’s 2019 first-round pick equated protesters to the cops who contributed to Floyd’s death in Minnesota.

Here is what he said

This is controversial? In what alternate universe? Frankly, that is one of the most lucid descriptions I have heard. McGary did not criticize the actual protesters at all. He criticized the trash that is looting, burning, destroying, and terrorizing. He criticized those who are destroying communities and businesses, many of them owned by Blacks. Again, in what universe is that controversial in any way? But, the speech Nazis came for him, and, sadly, he turned coward and chose to grovel

Again, he spoke the truth, that is now forbidden it seems.

The Useless Nations-Stupidity on steroids

Via Blazing Cat Fur comes this exercise in idiocy

Canada came within a whisker of losing its place in a United Nations peacekeeping mission in the fall of 2018 because of the military’s inability to consistently deploy enough women to meet the world body’s guidelines.

Is there a better example of how leftism corodes, and eventually destroys everything it touches than the U.N.? Then, there is the pervasive racism being pushed by the leftist “Woke Brigade”

An elite Manhattan school is teaching white students as young as 6 that they’re born racist and should feel guilty benefiting from “white privilege,” while heaping praise and cupcakes on their black peers.

Administrators at the Bank Street School for Children on the Upper West Side claim it’s a novel approach to fighting discrimination, and that several other private New York schools are doing it, but even liberal parents aren’t buying it.

A novel approach to fighting discrimination? By teaching hatred and racist ideology? This is NOT the way to have less hate. Instead, it is the way to create more division. But, of course, that is the point of this isn’t it? The left advances its twisted ideology by dividing people along every line they can. Rather than teaching individualism, they teach straight up hate. And the results? People like this idiot

This walking brain donor would likely tell you she is not racist at all. She has been indoctrinated to hate White people based on their color. THIS is what college teaches now. 

Latest worst thing ever? Charity!

The left exposes its collectivist beliefs once more. You, or me, choosing to give a donation to help the needy is an individual act, a choice. Collectivists, like the nutty speaker referenced at Campus Reform, cannot tolerate such an act. Charity must be forced, by the state, to be meaningful to this evil man.

A guest lecturer at Harvard University told students that philanthropy is inherently problematic, calling generosity the “wingman of systems of injustice.”

Anand Giridharadas, author of Winner Takes All: The Elite Charade of Changing the Worldspoke at the Harvard Institute of Politics in November. Giridharadas began his speech by noting that the venue, named for John F. Kennedy Jr. “may be the only space at Harvard not named after a random rich guy who gave a lot of money,” and joking that it would soon be named after Jeffrey Epstein.

Almost all the rest of the spaces at Harvard, he lamented, are named after large donors to Harvard. He went on to observe that “hyper-rich” people are always doing “everything they could to change the world,” and asked, “Why is this happening?”

Giridharadas explained that the more an individual or entity is harming the public, the more it will advertise what they are doing to help the community. Harvard, he claims, is enabling this flaw within society by accepting money from countless donors without looking into where the money comes from.

“What if all the generosity is the wingman of systems of injustice?” asked Giridharadas, before going on to explain to the students that the only way the millionaires and billionaires are able to exist is because of the “surplus virtue” created by positive entities like charities and universities. He explains that bad people have a moral “virtue deficit,” which causes them to “make a trade” with entities that hold “surplus virtue” in order to keep their name clean.

Twisted ideology anyone?

Detroit Police Chief reacts to Racist Rashida Tlaib’s call for Whites to be banned from working in facial recognition

First here is the perpetually bitter Tlaib

What a moron, and a racist, but i repeat myself. Now the Chief’s response

Imagine how long trash like Tlaib would last in Congress if the media did nothing more than cover her hatred and ignorance?

1619? More race baiting leftist propaganda for “woke” folks

The left wants us all to think America sucks. They even want us all to think America sucked before there was an America! The NY Times, the ONLY paper you should line your birdcage with, is helping to  spread the Hate America Narrative. Mike McDaniel, who is a national treasure, ain’t having it!

Kurt Schlichter has a quick take on the issue:

Now our grotesque liberal elite, backed up by the Fredocon goobers whose awakening intwokeness happened to perfectly coincide with their utter rejection by us actual conservatives, have decided that our entire history is based upon slavery. The New York Timesis spearheading this latest trash-the-rubes initiative, fresh off its ‘RUSSIA! TREASON! COLLUSION! EMOLUMENTS!’ humiliation. Trying to shame us – many of us literally veterans of the Cold War – with allegations of partying with Putin didn’t work out so great, so why not pivot to morally undermining us for having slaves we didn’t have?

Our elite is such garbage.

Indeed they are.  Take the link and read Kurt’s entire article if you have any doubt about that. The Weekalso weighs inon the “1619 Project”:

Yet that isn’t the point of the 1619 project. The point, once again, is to ‘reframe American history’ so that this appalling history stands at the very center of who we are as a country. Achieving that goal has required the Times to treat history in a highly sensationalistic, reductionistic, and tendentious way, with the cumulative result resembling agitprop more than responsible journalism or scholarship. Putting aside any pretense toward nuance or complexity, the paper has surrendered to the sensibility of left-wing political activists. The result is unpersuasive — and a sad comment on the state of our country’s public life.

Throughout the issue of the NYTM, headlines make, with just slight variations, the same rhetorical move over and over again: “Here is something unpleasant, unjust, or even downright evil about life in the present-day United States. Bet you didn’t realize that slavery is ultimately to blame.” Lack of universal access to health care? High rates of sugar consumption? Callous treatment of incarcerated prisoners? White recording artists “stealing” black music? Harsh labor practices? That’s right — all of it, and far more, follows from slavery.

Go read it all folks. 

Liz Warren continues to spread her vile anti-cop lies

This is truly despicable behavior. This is not a politician “fudging” the truth, or pandering. This is a power hungry politician deliberately lying and using the most hateful, divisive, and yes, dangerous rhetoric. 

He was “unarmed”. Yes, and he assaulted the officer who shot him, trying to take the officers gun. He was also 6′ 4″ and 300 pounds, and was charging at the officer when he was shot. What does noted liar Warren believe would have happened if Brown had not been shot? The officer had no option but to use deadly force. If Warren does not believe that then she should read the findings of the Obama Justice Department, which ruled the officer justified in shooting Brown.

But, Warren does not end her dangerous propaganda there. She then adds that Brown was an unarmed man, who was shot down in the middle of the street, and “left to die” by police? Talk about doubling down! AGAIN, she is ignoring every bit of actual evidence

 The Obama administration Justice Department released an 86-page investigative report concluding there was no credible evidence to discount Wilson’s story that he acted in self-defense.

Witnesses saw Brown punching Wilson inside of his police car when the officer stopped him after realizing he was a suspect in a store robbery. Physical evidence and eyewitness testimony supported Wilson’s account that Brown tried to take his gun and assaulted him inside his vehicle. Then, when he took off running, Wilson chased after him. Brown, ignoring instructions to stand down, charged at Wilson, and the officer fired multiple shots, killing him.

What is Warren looking to do spur more riots like that which followed the shooting in 2014? What price is she willing for others to pay so she might win the White House? She bemoans the president’s hateful rhetoric, then spews the venomous lies about law enforcement? And you know they are gratuitous lies when the mainstream media takes you to task.

“Harris and Warren have ignored the findings of the Justice Department to accuse Wilson of murder, even though the Justice Department found no credible evidence to support that claim,” Kessler wrote. “Instead, the Justice Department found that the popular narrative was wrong, according to witnesses deemed to be credible, some of whom testified reluctantly because of fear of reprisal. The department produced a comprehensive report to determine what happened, making the senators’ dismissal of it even more galling.”

What a truly despicable woman. Does she wants more attacks on police officers? More riots fueled by false narratives. What price is too high for the morally stunted Senator?

Ever notice how much like Nazis Leftists are becoming

This, from The Daily Caller

The New York Times published an op-ed Saturday that calls for border protection agents to face “serious social costs” and public shaming over their work at facilities housing migrant children.

“The identities of the individual Customs and Border Protection agents who are physically separating children from their families and staffing the detention centers are not undiscoverable,” writes Kate Cronin-Furman, an assistant professor at University College London.

“Immigration lawyers have agent names; journalists reporting at the border have names, photos and even videos. These agents’ actions should be publicized, particularly in their home communities.”

In the article, Cronin-Furman proposes a public shaming campaign — which she insists is not the same as “doxxing” — in hopes of forcing border protection agents to quit their jobs. She also said her proposal would deter others from taking jobs as border agent

Go read it all it gets worse

Google emails label Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Dennis Prager as Nazis

The demented left keeps sinking further into absolute madness. Via Wheelgun

In what has to be THE most bone-headed view of the year (maybe of the century)… Google Calls Ben Shapiro A Nazi.

In a Facebook post, Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief of the Daily Wire, described the email as “UNBELIEVABLE.” Shapiro is a practicing Orthodox Jew and a graduate of a Yeshiva high school.

What they really mean is, “Ben Shapiro doesn’t agree with us, and we can’t counter his arguments, so let’s just censor him.”

The best quote comes from Rep. Dan Crenshaw, see the link below, where he asks, “What kind of education do the people at Google have?” To label an Orthodox Jew, who is routinely attacked by the alt-right, a Nazi is the stupidest position Google has had in a long time. And that is saying something.

It must be noted that Dennis Prager is also Jewish, yet, his site PragerU is also smeared as being one step from Nazism somehow

The email, written by a Google employee reads as follows:

“Today it is often 1 or 2 steps to nazis. If we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles you mention in step 1. I can receive these recommendations regardless of the content of what I’m looking at, and I have recorded thousands of internet users sharing the same experience..”

Rep. Dan Crenshaw lays it out very well, video at Breitbart please go listen to that five minutes

Sometimes, just sometimes, the Social Justice Warriors pay a heavy price for their evil

Frankly, what this nation needs is more of actual justice being bestowed upon the left. Stacy McCain tells the tale of Oberlin College getting their just desserts

Iran attacked oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman, which might lead to war, but that’s trivial compared to the big news from Ohio today:

The jury just rendered its verdict on punitive damages in the Gibson’s Bakery v. Oberlin College case.
Daniel McGraw, our reporter in the courtroom, reports that in addition to the $11.2 million compensatory damages awarded last Friday, the jury awarded a total of $33 million in punitive damages, which will probably be reduced by the court to $22 million because of the state law cap at twice compensatory (it’s not an absolute cap, but probably will apply here). That brings the total damages to $33 million. . . .
The breakdown was:
David Gibson – $17.5 million punitive damages
Allyn W. Gibson — $8.75 million punitive damages
Gibson Bros. Inc. (the Bakery) – $6,973,500 punitive damages.

Legal Insurrection has covered this story from the beginning, and Professor William Jacobson had his say in the Wall Street Journal:

On a different campus on a different day, it is unlikely a simple shoplifting case would have gained much attention. But the incident occurred the day after Donald Trump was elected president, in the wake of which Oberlin students appeared ready to build on the school’s history of left-wing activism to exercise their angst. Thus this otherwise unexciting crime became their cause célèbre. . . .
In this case, Oberlin students and administrators appeared happy to smear a family-run institution in pursuit of a “social justice” agenda. Ignoring the facts, they attempted to destroy a business without concern for the damage they were inflicting on a family and workers in their own community. . . .
For Oberlin, it didn’t have to end this way. At the height of the controversy, the Gibson family says it asked the school to send a letter to students reiterating what had already become clear: The bakery didn’t engage in racial profiling. Administrators refused. Had the college agreed to refute the baseless claims of racism, it is unlikely that the Gibson family would have pursued the matter in court.
The verdict is in, and it regards more than money. The jury held accountable an unhinged progressive activist college that lost concern for the lives of working people in its community.

Now, for those who might not know what caused all of this, check William Jacobson’s reporting on this

Yes, the Outrageously Outraged leftist mob did not wait for facts before launching into their usual campaign of target and destroy. Well, destruction they sought  and, in this case the leftist mob got what they deserved, their own asses handed to them. In this case, as in so many others, leftists attack a business, screaming about racism, sexism, etc. They smear, they rage, they protest, they demand justice! Justice, in their minds, of course means ignoring facts and evidence, and instead trying to absolutely destroy the targeted business. Daniel McGraw ads some context, and exposes the irrational hatred that drives the left to engage in such evil

[Gibson’s lead attorney Lee] Plakas closed with a pair of social media send-outs that he thinks the jury should see as indicative of the school being in charge of the entire affair. In August of 2017, when the three shoplifters plead guilty and were put on probation, Toni Myers, Oberlin College’s Multicultural Resource Center Director then, [sent] out a text which said, “After a year, I hope we rain fire and brimstone on that store.”
That year length in question, Plakas said, was the time it would take for the three shoplifters to finish probation and have their criminal record expunged.
He also told the jury that the definition of the “fire and brimstone” that Oberlin College administrators were sharing was two definitions in biblical terms: “torment suffered by sinners in hell” and “punishment that lasts forever.”
His second email mentioned in closing was when Meredith Raimondo sent out one about a college professor’s letter to the editor to the school newspaper on the protests. Roger Copeland, an Oberlin College professor of theater and dance (he is “emeritus” status now) criticized how the school was treating Gibson’s soon after the protests ended.
“F–k him,” Raimondo sent out in an email to the school’s communication’s director. “I’d say unleash the students if I wasn’t convinced this needs to be put behind us.”
Plakas used this now-famed email again. “They can’t say they have no control over their students, how they have free speech and are independent, but they can leash their students on unleash them whenever they want?” he asked the jury.
“When a powerful institution says you are racist, you are doomed.

And, as I stated earlier, sometimes, just sometimes, these leftist jackals reap what they sow, as Stacy McCain puts it

Well, the jury in Lorain County has delivered its own “fire and brimstone,” and smoke is rising from the crater of Oberlin College.

Dirtbag State Congressman bullies elderly woman

Via the Right Scoop

What a Leftist thug

The there is this

What a shit stain

Just a reminder that Rahm Emanuel is a committed leftist agitator

But of course the whole Jussie Smollett fiasco is Trump’s fault

Just a side note about Emanuels reference to Charlottesville. When Trump spoke about “good people” on both sides, he was not referring to the dirtbags White supremacists, or to the Antifa trash. He was talking about the peaceful people opposed to taking down lee’s statue on one side, and the peaceful people who thought the statue should come down. Emanuel is simply repeating a false talking point Damned Lie that the left has regurgitated to bash Trump. Trump was crystal clear in his condemnation of the White Supremacists and their demented ideology. He also condemned the Antifa trash that fought with the White supremacists. Both groups are a waste of skin, Trump made that clear. Anyone who continues to mischaracterize what Trump said about them is either a liar, or deeply ignorant

Water is wet, grass is green, and yes, Eric Holder is still a gigantic tool

Observe as the King of Gun Runners speaks

In pointed terms during an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday, Obama-era attorney general Eric Holder posed the question to MAGA-chanting Trump supporters: “Exactly when did you think America was great?”

After speaking during Wednesday’s MSNBC interview with Holder on topics like criminal justice reform and partisan redistricting – which the ex-AG says is now his focus instead of running for the White House in 2020 – host Ari Melber had asked him: “There is a lot of talk about America being a leader as a democracy, quote unquote, in the 1800s when women and African-Americans couldn’t vote. What kind of democracy is that?”

I must note here that, AGAIN, we are not a democracy, the Founders were very clear on that. And, yes, it was never right that women and Blacks could not vote, but, if you read history, you will see that America fixed those issues. Your welcome! Now back to the Mexican cartels favorite AG

Holder, unprovoked, then used his answer to tear into Trump’s campaign rally cry.

That’s exactly right. And that’s what I hear these things about ‘let’s make America great again’ and I think to myself, ‘exactly when did you think America was great’?” he said on the show.

“It certainly wasn’t when people were enslaved. It certainly wasn’t when women didn’t have the right to vote. It certainly wasn’t when the LGBT community was denied the rights to which it was entitled.”

“It takes us back to what I think, an American past that never in fact really existed. This notion of greatness,” Holder replied.

Another America-bashing leftist. The sins Holder points to are not uniquely American are they? And, as time has passed, and those sins have been purged America has become greater. It has become the most generous nation on earth, and the most tolerant and inclusive. Yet, Leftists like Holder hates America. Not because of our past, but because of our founding principles of natural rights, and individual liberties. Such principles aggrieve leftists like Holder, who frowns upon natural rights like freedom of speech, religion, and association. And that whole right to bear arms? Whoa he loathes that as well! He much prefers the Collectivist model where the state is supreme and the individual is tightly controlled by central planners. In truth Holder loathes the individual, and natural rights.

*VIDEO* Congressman Jim Jordan Delivers Blistering Opening Statement Against DemoNazis At Hearing Featuring Crooked Lawyer Who Will Soon Be Imprisoned For Perjury ( 02/27/19)


.

.

Oh Bernie!

Via Moonbattery

Bernie Sanders was a big fan of the Soviet Union. At the height of the Cold War, when the USSR was poised to vaporize every major American city, he was Mayor of Burlington and had a Soviet flag on his office wall. After he married the woman who later destroyed Burlington College, they honeymooned in Russia, when it was in the grip of communist dictatorship and not the kind of place you would go without good reason.

Some complained that life in the Soviet Union entailed spending many hours waiting in line for bread. Back in the day, Bernie explained why this was no big deal:

When we are told all the “hate” is from the Right…………

Remember examples like this

According to Stacy McCain in “Lessons From an Online Lynching (Why #StandWithCovington Is Going Viral)”

One of the basic rules of political journalism is, you don’t have to comment on every controversy that comes along. And you certainly don’t have to rush to become the first to publish such a commentary. What happened over the weekend with a viral video of Catholic school boys confronted by a protester in D.C. should remind us of that rule.

On Friday, students from Covington Catholic School participated in the annual March for Life in Washington. On Saturday, a video clip was posted that claimed to show the students — many of whom were wearing red “Make America Great Again” hats — engaged in harassment of a Native American activist named Nathan Phillips. This clip went viral on Twitter, with a swarm of blue-check pundits excoriating the boys.

Remember what Leftist Tolerance is…. It is wanting to assault teens

Fritz sums this up very well

Does this not characterize our media class perfectly? Willing to promote violence against a teenager who stood still and smiled while a smarmy leftist banged a drum in his face? CNN should fire him, but won’t. And he’s not the only one. One Hollywood director suggested feeding the kids with MAGA hats through a wood chipper, Fargo style. Just kidding, I’m sure, but there was real misplaced anger behind it. That’s just like the Disney flicks I know and love!

I am sure Stalin would be proud. But this is what the Leftist Outrage Factory gives us. Threatening families that are not even related to these kids

Leftists on Twitter, hell-bent on punishing the MAGA-hat wearing student who came face to face with Native American protester Nathan Phillips, wrongly identified and targeted a Cincinnati, Ohio teenager, and doxxed and threatened his family.

The Washington Examiner reports that social media users, going off publicly available photos of Cincinnati high school students, noticed a resemblance between the student pictured with Phillips and Michael Hodges, a high school junior who was, reportedly, not present at the incident in Washington, D.C.. Taking the photo at face value, members of the Twitter mob began trying to get the hashtag “#MichaelHodges” trending, to “name and shame” the “racist” teen in the video.

Its not clear Hodges even goes to Covington Catholic High School.

But small things like facts were too difficult for the outraged mob who, according to Hodges’ brother Andrew, quickly doxxed Hodges’ parents and relatives, “spamming” them with threats of violence. The group also contacted Cincinnati University, which Hodges is expected to attend after high school as a culinary arts major, demanding the school rescind Hodges’ acceptance.

Andrew Hodges detailed the situation in a tweet-storm late Sunday.

Go read the rest folks it is truly sickening. Also it sickens me that the media covers for this garbage.

Remember folks THIS is not racism, or extremism, and never expect the media to cover it

Looks like a Stalinist starter kit would be down with killing Whitey!

A University of Georgia (UGA) teaching assistant wrote Wednesday on Facebook that “some white people may have to die for black communities to be made whole in this struggle to advance to freedom.” He added that to suggest otherwise is “ahistorical and dangerously naive.”

UGA philosophy TA Irami Osei-Frimpong made the comment during a conversation on the Overheard at UGA Facebook page. The comment has since been deleted. Osei-Frimpong claimed in May 2017 that Facebook suspended him for quoting from an article which detailed how Texas A&M professor Tommy Curry had said “in order to be equal, in order to be liberated, some white people may have to die.”

“Killing some white people isn’t genocide; it’s killing some white people,” the UGA TA explained in a Medium post. “We had to kill some white people to get out of slavery. Maybe if we’d killed more during the 20th century we still wouldn’t talk about racialized voter disenfranchisement and housing, education, and employment discrimination. This should not be controversial.”

Again, this is the Left, calling for violence

Yes, the Left, Leftism, and Leftists are EVIL

And cowardly I might add. Consider a college group attacking murdered police officer Natalie Corona

The Ethnic and Cultural Affairs Commission at the University of California, Davis posted a Facebook message saying that murdered police officer Natalie Corona was racist because she posed with a Blue Lives Matter flag in various photos. UC-Davis, for its part, responded, albeit quite tepidly.

“The flag is blatantly anti-Black and disrespectful,” the ECAC stated in its since-deleted post.

“We would also like to provide resources for students triggered by this event and the circulating images of a flag that has been popularized by the ‘Blue Lives Matter’ crowd,” the group continued. “We see it necessary to call-out all community members who continue to post and disseminate images of the Blue Lives Matter flag online.”

Oh what? Does this offend you Marxists pieces of garbage?

This?

blm

This offends you?

blm5

This triggers you? How about this?

blm2

Or maybe this makes you feel “Victimized”?

blm4

Good! I hope these do trigger you?! 

Here is the picture you referred to as racist, the picture officer Natalie Corona posted

blm6

This beautiful, heroic woman laid down her life to protect and serve. Yes, even ungrateful moral retards like you social justice warriors! You are too stupid and consumed with hatred to grasp that without people like this officer, and so many more that serve, you would not have the privilege of living in this nation that allows your the freedom to trash it, and those heroes that protect such freedoms. But, I imagine you would be quick to call an officer if you needed help wouldn’t you, you self-consumed little parasites?

Angela Davis is an evil, twisted soul, which is why the Left idolizes her

Yes, she is evil

You can tell a lot about people by looking at their heroes.

When the Women’s March honored the Stalinist cheerleader Angela Davis in 2017, there was almost no pushback from Jewish or liberal groups. You can forgive members of the Resistance, concerned with the impending Trumpian dystopia, for not yet comprehending the bigoted and extremist positions of those leading the Women’s March.

Go read it all, but consider this

When human rights activist Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who knew a thing or two about the “prison industrial complex,” gave his Voice of Freedom speech in 1975, he relayed a story about manufactured heroism and hypocrisy that surrounded Davis.

There’s a certain woman here named Angela Davis. I don’t know if you are familiar with her in this country, but in our country, literally for one whole year, we heard of nothing at all except about Angela Davis. There was only Angela Davis in the whole world and she was suffering. We had our ears stuffed with Angela Davis. Little children in school were told to sign petitions in defense of Angela Davis. Little boys and girls, 8 and 9 years old in schools, were asked to do this. Well, they set her free. Although she didn’t have a rough time in this country, she came to recuperate in Soviet resorts. Some Soviet dissidents — but more important, a group of Czech dissidents— addressed an appeal to her: ”Comrade Davis, you were in prison. You know how unpleasant it is to sit in prison, especially when you consider yourself innocent. You now have such authority. Could you help our Czech prisoners? Could you stand up for those persons in Czechoslovakia who are being persecuted by the state?” Angela Davis answered: ‘They deserve what they get. Let them remain in prison.’ That is the face of communism.

Solzhenitsyn was referring to Jiri Pelikan, one of the supporters of the Prague Spring, who had asked Davis, as she was vacationing in Russian resorts and collecting honorary degrees, if she would advocate for political prisoners. She would not.

Alan Dershowitz, in his 1992 “Chutzpah” book, relays a similar incident in which Davis, a woman who went on to be a professor in the “History of Consciousness” at the University of California, not only refused to stand up for prisoners of conscience in the Soviet Union but argued that their imprisonment was justified.

I also worked as an unpaid consultant on an aspect of the Angela Davis case in California. Davis, who was one of the leaders of the American Communist party, was charged with murder in connection with a 1970 shoot-out at a Marin County courthouse. She claimed that as a black, a woman, and a Communist, she could not receive a fair trial in any American court. She was acquitted, so maybe she was right! After her acquittal, she announced that she would be devoting the remainder of her life to defending political prisoners like herself. A short time later, I read that she was going to Moscow to receive some human rights prize from the Soviet Union. I called her office and gave them a list of Jewish prisoners of conscience in the Soviet Union – Jews who had been imprisoned because they wanted to emigrate to Israel or to learn about their heritage. I asked if she would be willing to speak up on behalf of these political prisoners. Several days later, I received a call back from Ms. Davis’s secretary informing me that Davis had looking into the people on my list and none of them were political prisoners ‘They are all Zionist fascists and opponents of Socialism.’ Davis would urge that they be kept in prison where they belonged.

Yes, I called her evil, because she is