Category: Left-Wing Hate

Latest worst thing ever? Charity!

The left exposes its collectivist beliefs once more. You, or me, choosing to give a donation to help the needy is an individual act, a choice. Collectivists, like the nutty speaker referenced at Campus Reform, cannot tolerate such an act. Charity must be forced, by the state, to be meaningful to this evil man.

A guest lecturer at Harvard University told students that philanthropy is inherently problematic, calling generosity the “wingman of systems of injustice.”

Anand Giridharadas, author of Winner Takes All: The Elite Charade of Changing the Worldspoke at the Harvard Institute of Politics in November. Giridharadas began his speech by noting that the venue, named for John F. Kennedy Jr. “may be the only space at Harvard not named after a random rich guy who gave a lot of money,” and joking that it would soon be named after Jeffrey Epstein.

Almost all the rest of the spaces at Harvard, he lamented, are named after large donors to Harvard. He went on to observe that “hyper-rich” people are always doing “everything they could to change the world,” and asked, “Why is this happening?”

Giridharadas explained that the more an individual or entity is harming the public, the more it will advertise what they are doing to help the community. Harvard, he claims, is enabling this flaw within society by accepting money from countless donors without looking into where the money comes from.

“What if all the generosity is the wingman of systems of injustice?” asked Giridharadas, before going on to explain to the students that the only way the millionaires and billionaires are able to exist is because of the “surplus virtue” created by positive entities like charities and universities. He explains that bad people have a moral “virtue deficit,” which causes them to “make a trade” with entities that hold “surplus virtue” in order to keep their name clean.

Twisted ideology anyone?

Detroit Police Chief reacts to Racist Rashida Tlaib’s call for Whites to be banned from working in facial recognition

First here is the perpetually bitter Tlaib

What a moron, and a racist, but i repeat myself. Now the Chief’s response

Imagine how long trash like Tlaib would last in Congress if the media did nothing more than cover her hatred and ignorance?

1619? More race baiting leftist propaganda for “woke” folks

The left wants us all to think America sucks. They even want us all to think America sucked before there was an America! The NY Times, the ONLY paper you should line your birdcage with, is helping to  spread the Hate America Narrative. Mike McDaniel, who is a national treasure, ain’t having it!

Kurt Schlichter has a quick take on the issue:

Now our grotesque liberal elite, backed up by the Fredocon goobers whose awakening intwokeness happened to perfectly coincide with their utter rejection by us actual conservatives, have decided that our entire history is based upon slavery. The New York Timesis spearheading this latest trash-the-rubes initiative, fresh off its ‘RUSSIA! TREASON! COLLUSION! EMOLUMENTS!’ humiliation. Trying to shame us – many of us literally veterans of the Cold War – with allegations of partying with Putin didn’t work out so great, so why not pivot to morally undermining us for having slaves we didn’t have?

Our elite is such garbage.

Indeed they are.  Take the link and read Kurt’s entire article if you have any doubt about that. The Weekalso weighs inon the “1619 Project”:

Yet that isn’t the point of the 1619 project. The point, once again, is to ‘reframe American history’ so that this appalling history stands at the very center of who we are as a country. Achieving that goal has required the Times to treat history in a highly sensationalistic, reductionistic, and tendentious way, with the cumulative result resembling agitprop more than responsible journalism or scholarship. Putting aside any pretense toward nuance or complexity, the paper has surrendered to the sensibility of left-wing political activists. The result is unpersuasive — and a sad comment on the state of our country’s public life.

Throughout the issue of the NYTM, headlines make, with just slight variations, the same rhetorical move over and over again: “Here is something unpleasant, unjust, or even downright evil about life in the present-day United States. Bet you didn’t realize that slavery is ultimately to blame.” Lack of universal access to health care? High rates of sugar consumption? Callous treatment of incarcerated prisoners? White recording artists “stealing” black music? Harsh labor practices? That’s right — all of it, and far more, follows from slavery.

Go read it all folks. 

Liz Warren continues to spread her vile anti-cop lies

This is truly despicable behavior. This is not a politician “fudging” the truth, or pandering. This is a power hungry politician deliberately lying and using the most hateful, divisive, and yes, dangerous rhetoric. 

He was “unarmed”. Yes, and he assaulted the officer who shot him, trying to take the officers gun. He was also 6′ 4″ and 300 pounds, and was charging at the officer when he was shot. What does noted liar Warren believe would have happened if Brown had not been shot? The officer had no option but to use deadly force. If Warren does not believe that then she should read the findings of the Obama Justice Department, which ruled the officer justified in shooting Brown.

But, Warren does not end her dangerous propaganda there. She then adds that Brown was an unarmed man, who was shot down in the middle of the street, and “left to die” by police? Talk about doubling down! AGAIN, she is ignoring every bit of actual evidence

 The Obama administration Justice Department released an 86-page investigative report concluding there was no credible evidence to discount Wilson’s story that he acted in self-defense.

Witnesses saw Brown punching Wilson inside of his police car when the officer stopped him after realizing he was a suspect in a store robbery. Physical evidence and eyewitness testimony supported Wilson’s account that Brown tried to take his gun and assaulted him inside his vehicle. Then, when he took off running, Wilson chased after him. Brown, ignoring instructions to stand down, charged at Wilson, and the officer fired multiple shots, killing him.

What is Warren looking to do spur more riots like that which followed the shooting in 2014? What price is she willing for others to pay so she might win the White House? She bemoans the president’s hateful rhetoric, then spews the venomous lies about law enforcement? And you know they are gratuitous lies when the mainstream media takes you to task.

“Harris and Warren have ignored the findings of the Justice Department to accuse Wilson of murder, even though the Justice Department found no credible evidence to support that claim,” Kessler wrote. “Instead, the Justice Department found that the popular narrative was wrong, according to witnesses deemed to be credible, some of whom testified reluctantly because of fear of reprisal. The department produced a comprehensive report to determine what happened, making the senators’ dismissal of it even more galling.”

What a truly despicable woman. Does she wants more attacks on police officers? More riots fueled by false narratives. What price is too high for the morally stunted Senator?

Ever notice how much like Nazis Leftists are becoming

This, from The Daily Caller

The New York Times published an op-ed Saturday that calls for border protection agents to face “serious social costs” and public shaming over their work at facilities housing migrant children.

“The identities of the individual Customs and Border Protection agents who are physically separating children from their families and staffing the detention centers are not undiscoverable,” writes Kate Cronin-Furman, an assistant professor at University College London.

“Immigration lawyers have agent names; journalists reporting at the border have names, photos and even videos. These agents’ actions should be publicized, particularly in their home communities.”

In the article, Cronin-Furman proposes a public shaming campaign — which she insists is not the same as “doxxing” — in hopes of forcing border protection agents to quit their jobs. She also said her proposal would deter others from taking jobs as border agent

Go read it all it gets worse