Category: Feminism

Feminism, just something else the left hijacked and weaponized

The Other McCain lays out the case against modern day “Feminism”

Feminism is a totalitarian movement to destroy civilizations as we know it, and the more power a totalitarian movement gets, the more power they crave. There is no logical stopping point for the demands of a totalitarian. You give Hitler the Sudetenland, and next he’ll annex the rest of Czechoslovakia and invade Poland. So the more our society seeks to appease feminists, they angrier feminists become, and the more insane the demands they make. Feminism is an anti-male hate movement, and no man is safe from its destructive power. However, the men most vulnerable to this destruction are those who consider themselves “enlightened” and “sensitive,” and who naïvely believe that their support for “equality” will prevent them from becoming targets of feminist wrath.

Consider the case of Jonathan Kaiman, a young journalist who was Beijing bureau chief of the Los Angeles Times, and was elected in 2017 as president of the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China (FCCC). And then #MeToo happened. In January 2018, a girl he’d hooked up with one night in 2013 wrote a blog post in which she described their encounter as, well, not entirely consensual on her part:

After an evening out drinking and flirting, [Laura] Tucker drove Kaiman on her scooter back to her apartment. There, she wrote, they mutually and consensually undressed and got into bed. . . .
Tucker wrote that while making out in bed with Kaiman, she had a change of heart, so she stood up and said she didn’t want to continue. . . .

You can read the rest. Evidently, Kaiman persuaded her to resume their encounter, but she says it made her feel “gross” and, once Tucker did her #MeToo hit-piece on Kaiman, another woman came forward to say that she, too, had a less-than-entirely-consensual encounter with him. The result was the destruction of Kaiman’s once-promising career.

Feminists insist there should be only one side of these stories. If a woman says a man sexually assaulted her, we must #BelieveWomen and forget everything we know about human nature. If a woman goes out drinking with a guy, then she takes him back to her apartment, what do we presume the intended outcome to be? A case like this could never be prosecuted as rape in a court of law, but thanks to #MeToo and its #BelieveWomen principle, any man who has ever had sex with a woman is a potential target for destruction. All your ex-girlfriend has to do is write a Facebook post claiming that you somehow victimized her and — BOOM! — your reputation is permanently destroyed.

Womxn? WTF?

Moonbattery has a new episode of insanity from the left

The prevailing Cultural Marxist hatred of men that allowed Christine Blasey Ford to take her absurd stunt to such alarming lengths may force an update to the Newspeak dictionary. So as to rid the sacred word “women” of the unholy stem “men,” moonbats at the Wellcome Collection museum/library in London spell it “womxn.”

The Beeb assures us it is not a typo:

Like women, womxn refers to females, but it is an attempt to get away from patriarchal language.

Dr Clara Bradbury-Rance, fellow at King’s College London, said the spelling “stems from a longstanding objection to the word woman as it comes from man, and the linguistic roots of the word mean that it really does come from the word man”.

Good Freaking Grief, the level of obsession with “identity” is simply unimaginable. these folks are disturbed

When you realize they are batshit KRAZY!

Your Good Freaking Grief moment of aggravation

The State University of New York system recently held a “SUNY Spectrum” conference that discussed preventing “violence against the LGBTQI+ community” by using inclusive language.

According to the content of slideshows, titles, and descriptions of conference sessions obtained by Campus Reform, the phrase “preventing violence” was intended to encompass a wide range of concepts, including the use of “supportive terminology” such as “homoflexible,” “gray romantic,” and “akoisexual.”

Homoflexible? Is that like a Gay gymnast? Gray romantic? Someone into old farts? And my favorite made-up “identity” “akoisexual”. Whatever the actual fuck that is. And the lunacy? It is just starting to percolate!

Similarly, the conference also featured a talk on creating “affirming spaces for transgender and gender-nonconforming students” in an effort to “give attendees direct takeaways for how to create inclusive spaces for students of all gender identities,” from “forms and paperwork to attitudes and language.”

“The presentation will also touch on how LGBTQ+ representation and inclusion in power-based violence prevention affects the ways students with marginalized identities are able to participate in prevention programming in the college setting,” the organizers explain.

Oh Dear Lord! Where is my Advil? And don’t even get me started on “Ecofeminist Spirituality” Yes, it seems that is a thing too

The Portland State University Women’s Studies department will offer a course next semester exploring “ecological feminist spirituality” and the potential for an “ecological revolution.”

Ecofeminist Spirituality” is a senior-level course taught by Dr. Frodo Okulam, and primarily aims to explore “different forms of ecofeminist spirituality” including “feminist biblical interpretation” as well as “goddesses and spirituality.”

“The insight of Ecofeminism is that the oppression of women and the exploitation of the earth are related,” Okulam told Campus Reform, adding that “in its least radical form…it would use existing laws to reform our relationship with nature.”

But Okulam also teaches students about other variations of ecofeminism. In a handout she often provides to students, for instance, she explains that there are Socialist Ecofeminism, Radical Ecofeminism, and Spiritual Ecofeminist schools of thought.

The most radical of these, she says, is Socialist Ecofeminism, which “would end the domination of women and nature inherent in the capitalist economy’s exploitation of both” and “transform the structure of power itself.”

Wow, that is a lot of Feminuttery!

Michelle Obama scolds women who voted for Trump

Identity politics strikes again

“In light of this last election I’m concerned about women, about how we think about ourselves and each other. I think more about what is going on in our heads where we let that happen,” Obama said when speaking at the United State of Women Summit.

“So I do wonder what young girls are dreaming about when we’re still there when the most qualified person running was a woman, and look what we did instead,” Obama said. “Women are still suspicious of one another” and hold themselves to a higher standard than men, she claimed.

Allow me to translate for you ladies

Don’t you dumb gals know you are supposed to vote for leftists? You better remember your place!

There go the leftists again………..

Apparently the “pussy hat”is now RAAAAACIST

Members of the Women’s March movement are no longer grabbing their trademark pink “pussy hats” out of concern they might be offensive to minorities and transgender women.

Following Donald Trump’s inauguration, marchers donned pink cat ears, a mocking reference to the president’s hot mic comments saying that he enjoyed grabbing women by the “pussy.”

But the Detroit Free Pressreports that women activists in Michigan and elsewhere are making a conscious effort to move away from the hat out of fear that it “excludes and is offensive to transgender women and gender nonbinary people who don’t have typical female genitalia and to women of color because their genitals are more likely to be brown than pink.”

“I personally won’t wear one because if it hurts even a few people’s feelings, then I don’t feel like it’s unifying,” said Phoebe Hopps, the founder of Women’s March Michigan. “I care more about mobilizing people to the polls than wearing one hat one day of the year.”

I love that last comment. She wants to “unify” yet she backs a group that engages in vitriolic and divisive rhetoric directed at anyone who disagrees with its message? Talk about stuck on stupid.

Feminists be cray cray

Good Freaking Grief! I thought the Left loved them some science?

A feminist professor at the University of California-Davis has vowed to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” through a feminist lens.

Sara Giordano, who left the field of neuroscience to become a Women’s Studies professor at UC-Davis, opened up about her feelings towards the sciences in a recent essay for Catalyst, a journal of feminist theory.

Oh yes her feelings…………

Science, she worries, has “earned its epistemic authority through its co-constitution with colonization and slavery,” and therefore “relies on a colonial and racialized form of power.”

Not only is science rooted in racism, she alleges; it has been used to perpetuate racism and colonial practices.

“At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science,” she says, claiming that science’s distinction between “humans and non-humans” has allowed  “capitalism [to become] justified as a natural economic system.”

Crazy as a pet coon. Of course she is not alone in her insane rantings. Another brain donor is convinced that algebra is RAAAAACIST!

A math education professor at the University of Illinois argued in a newly published book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among whites.

Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a new anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.

Apparently mathematics is too, WHITE! And WHITE is evil or something

“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.

Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”

Math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.

Oh Good Lord! Math is important because people need a basic grasp of math to function! But that is RAAAAACIST! I mean knoweledge is like subjective right?

Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”

How deep into the Pit of Leftist Insanity can she go? Look out China!

Brie Larson finds her inner victim

Poor poor Brie Larson. Imagine the horribly horrific horror she endures because she is pretty and men might try getting her number. 

It the wake of the Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandal, a number of women have taken to Twitter to share their stories of when men made them feel uncomfortable.

Brie Larson was one of those women, sharing her own “uncomfortable” experience she had at an airport recently.

The Oscar-winning actress, 28, tweeted on Thursday about her experience after she behaved politely toward a TSA agent.

“I merely smiled at a TSA agent and he asked for my phone number,” she wrote. “To live life as a woman is to live life on the defense.”

Is she serious? What is it about Leftists that makes them so consumed with pretending to be victims of some type of discrimination, or  victimization?

Normal people, naturally took Brie to task for her whining petulance

The actress received criticism for the tweet, with on person replying, “OH NO! A guy asked for your number. You poor thing. Women be complaining they don’t find a good guy, but complain when dudes ask for their #.”

Well clearly this insensitive knuckle dragger does not grasp the emotional devastation that this flirtation had on poor, poor, Brie

The star quickly responded writing back,  “You do realize you’re blaming me for a situation I did not ask to be in? A situation that made me uncomfortable?”

Larson continued, “I hope you take the time to learn more about the experience of women. It’s real + scary sometimes and people like you can make it better.”

What Brie Larson experienced was normal, sorry but men are attracted to women. Especially women who are pretty like Brie Larson is, well on the outside anyway. On the inside she is, well, not very pretty at all. I mean claiming that a man asking for her number is harassment is asinine. 

Again, the reality is this. Men flirt with women, and sometimes ask for dates, phone numbers, etc. Women, of course are under no obligation to accept, believe me, I know because I have heard no thank you before. It happens. If a man continues to ask a woman out, or flirt openly, then he ought to get a grip, and stop. But, this is not what happened to Larson. For her to scream harassment only cheapens actual harassment and victims of it.

Lesbian activist seeks to make Wonder Woman hotter and enrage Feminists

Strange bedfellows?

Change.org petition titled “Make Wonder Woman Bisexual” was launched on Monday by one Gianna Collier-Pitts, who identifies as working for LGBT advocacy organization GLAAD.

The petition claims the global hit film starring actress Gal Gadot “was a success for everyone… except the bisexual community.”

So, the bisexual community must have every movies with bisexual leads? More Identity Obsession Disorder for America! And the idiocy deepens

“All I ask is that Warner Bros. directly acknowledge Diana Prince for who she is, who she has always been (regardless of her current love interest), and what her character could potentially represent for millions of people,” the petition concludes.

Hmmm, doesn’t the petitioner grasp that Diana Prince is, fictional, as in not real? But the news might not be all bad. If the next Wonder Woman features Gil Gadot, who is hot getting busy with other hot women, another “community” would be into it too. Men! 

This of course would aggrieve and offend Feminists, who hate to see men have fun. And we all know how entertaining wacky Feminists are when they are pissed, so, bring on the new “improved” Wonder Woman. Here are some suggestions for costars to help Gil Gadot “come out”. Let the Feminist meltdown commence!

Kearran Giovanni

kearran-giovanni

Cote de Pablo

Zeman-Cote-De-Pablo-00001

And yes, Salma Hayek, who could play the arch nemesis of Wonder Woman.

salma-hayek-cannes-15may15-11

Imagine the fun those two could have with that lasso Wonder Woman carries. Yes guys would love that, and Feminists would lose their freaking minds. Sounds like a win win to me

 

Latest threat to mankind? Gendering your pet

r908
Freaking Feminists!

Via Moonbattery

From the feminist revolutionaries at Medusa Magazine:

Pets cannot speak for themselves. They cannot tell you that they are being misgendered. It’s important not to make assumptions about what gender your animal is based off of its sex.

Hold on, it gets even crazier:

Sex and gender are separate things and are in no way intertwined. The sex of your pet is irrelevant. The only time you need to concern yourself with the sex of your pet is when you spay or neuter it (and this begs the question of whether or not we should perform operations on our pets without their consent). Animals can have diverse genders just like humans, and they can have diverse sexualities also.

Owners are advised to give their pets gender-neutral names and use gender-neutral pronouns. You wouldn’t want to offend your pet, which might be a trans-pet.

Also, it’s an important way to practice getting rid of gender norms all together [sic].

Good Freaking Grief! What type of loon thinks up this stuff??

When I say Feminists HATE men, well…….

Are you a man? Do you like sex? Do you enjoy making your partner climax? If you answered yes, then you are a sexist, knuckle dragging pig! H/T Moonbattery

Visiting Cosmopolitan might cause the dumb sensors to overload, so let’s take Daily Wire‘s word for what can be found there:

“It’s not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women. To make matters worse, a new study published in the Journal of Sex Research found — aside from deriving pleasure from their own orgasms, obviously — men also derive a specific sort of masculine pleasure from making female partners orgasm,” complains Cosmo Sex & Relationships editor Hannah Smothers.

Naturally, men enjoy sex more when their female partner has an orgasm; this is what the study has dubbed “masculinity achievement.”

Smothers says that there’s “nothing wrong with feeling good about making your partner feel good” — before explaining why it’s actually “sexist.”

“Despite increasing focus on women’s orgasms, research indicated that the increased attention to women’s orgasms may also serve men’s sexuality, complicating conceptualizations of women’s orgasms as women-centric,” researchers wrote.

In other words Feminists hate men, and hate men to have fun, which is why Feminists make love with their eyes closed. So, even if mean are giving women pleasure, it is still sexist!

Jewish Actress pushes back against noted Anti-Semite

Good for Mayim Bialik, who is hardly a Conservative, but she sees through the hateful rhetoric of  Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour

A recent series of articles about Palestinian-American political activist Linda Sarsour startled many in feminist and Jewish circles, me being one of them. In these articles, Sarsour states that feminism and Zionism are incompatible.

Sarsour said, “There is no country in this world that is immune to violating human rights. You can’t be a feminist in the United States and stand up for the rights of the American woman and then say that you don’t want to stand up for the rights of Palestinian women in Palestine.” (Check out this interview with Sarsour in The Nation.)

Zionism is the belief in the right of the Jewish people to have an autonomous state in Israel. I am a Zionist. Feminism is the belief that a woman-driven movement can bring about race, class and gender equality and that women deserve all of the rights and privileges afforded to men. I am a feminist. There are Zionists who are critical of certain Israeli policies and those who are not; there are Zionists who are anti-occupation and there are Zionists who are pro-settlement; and there are Zionists who fall between these extremes. The definitions of Zionism and feminism are not in conflict with each other. At all.

I would say that it depends on your definition of Feminism. Many Feminists today are for more invested in far-left ideology than in honoring or protecting women and women’s rights. In fact it might be argued that the Left has hijacked Feminism to push Leftist agendas rather than to fight for freedom for women.Bialik does not strike me as one of those “Feminists”. In other words she seems reasonable on the subject of Israel, where as Sarsour is rabidly anti-Israel. Here is more of Bialik

Are there things that happen in Israel and the Palestinian territories which cause pain and suffering to women? Absolutely. And being a Zionist doesn’t mean a definitional indifference to this suffering, especially of Palestinian women and children. The question is this: Many countries – many Muslim countries, in fact – perpetrate atrocities against women which include: female genital mutilation, forced marriages, child brides, systematic abuse of women by the justice system, revenge rape and honor killing. Why is Israel held to a standard none of these other countries – whose offenses are, arguably more extreme – are held to? And why is belief in the State of Israel something that should exclude women – or men, for that matter – from identifying as feminists?

Go read it all, it will give you some hope about having reasonable dialogues with Liberals.

News Flash! Sense of humor is now a hate crime or something

Alternate title, Offendeditis outbreak at American University, Feminists and Snowflakes hardest hit

The College Fix reported:

‘Anti-feminism’ posters at American University investigated as a ‘hate crime’

Law enforcement personnel are searching for the person who hung up “anti-feminism” posters around American University’s campus late Tuesday evening.

The posters parody the recent International Women’s Day as “International Nags [sic] Day,” and include the meme “Stop talking and bitching woman on March 8 and make me a sandwich.”

Rather remarkably, as Fox-5 reports, police are investigating this “vandalism” as a hate crime.

A crime alert was issued to the A.U. community which included photos of the suspect:

Here is the super duper extra offensive poster that some people think should be criminalized. Brace yourself, and make sure no children, or small animals can see the horror….

Oh no, how will our republic survive this? At worst this is in bad taste. To me it is funny, partly because it has some possibly inappropriate elements to it. But also because it is true. Feminism has devolved into angry, irrational hyperbole being screamed by perpetually pissed off “victims”. These women who go heavy into Feminism see discrimination everywhere. Hell they cannot order lunch without seeing the “Patriarchy” somewhere in the experience. But, I must say, I would have really liked these posters to be put up as well

A quick note here, I only put the photo of a hot woman drinking beer because men will like it, and Feminists hate anything that men enjoy.

Lena Dunham Illustrates Leftist Hypocrisy

Lena Dunham, appearing on The View, gives us a glaring look at how intellectually vacuous, and condescending, and completely self-absorbed the Left is. Have a look

Got all of that? White women are singled out as being childish, and selfish. Apparently they need an “empowered” woman like Lena Dunham to set them straight. What would an empowered Dunham tell White women who voted for Trump? Perhaps she could explain how being dependent on government for you health care, birth control, your sustenance, and of course your protection because women guns are bad is somehow empowering for them? She would then have to explain how these women voted against their own interests, and the interest of all women by when they cast votes for Trump? Are all women the very same now? They must all think in lock step to be a “real” woman? That is empowering? Apparently so, because identity politics is all Dunham knows it seems.

Dunham, who goes on left-wing shows like The View and gets praise heaped upon her for being a mind-numbed feminist drone really thinks she is an example of what all women should be. Never mind that she is, basically a brain washed women who has no perceptible talent, well, other than taking her clothes off every five seconds and saying inane things of course. She babbles about people being “at risk” because Trump won, and accuses Trump of not considering Muslims and trans-Americans to be human. She has zero evidence of this of course, but rhetoric must prevail. Facts? Proof of allegations? How dare you question the brilliant Lena Dunham? She is smart, certainly smarter than women who dared vote for Trump. I mean like, don’t they know they must have Dunham tell them how to vote? Stupid White women! Don’t they know their places?

If I could have been on that set, I would have posed this question to Dunham. Who is she to tell women, any woman, how to vote, or what is in their best interests? Are they not allowed to think for themselves?

Now even evil women are victims, as long as they are leftists

And when I say evil, I mean this type of evil

On a Twitter, on a Reddit forum, I stumbled over this horrifying story: Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.

What did this woman do? From Psychology Today, this:

Vigliarole believed the three girls were prostitutes who were going to have sex with him. Instead, they picked him up on March 8 in Elmhurst, Queens, at Maria’s home, and drugged him to make him drowsy. Then they drove him to Selma’s apartment in Harlem. The apartment had already been prepared for an extended torture session: The closet door had been cut, a pot put in it for use as a toilet, the windows boarded.

For the next 15 to 20 days (police aren’t sure just when Vigliarole died), the man was starved, burned, beaten, and tortured. (Even 10 years later, Spurling could recall Rita’s chilling response when they questioned her about shoving a three-foot metal bar up Vigliarole’s rear: “He was a homo anyway.” How did she know? “When I stuck the bar up his rectum he wiggled.”)

The three girls took turns watching the man. It was Donna who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarole’s, who was able to get a partial license plate number of the car she was driving. He notified the police, who traced the plate to a rental car facility. On April 6 the suspects were arrested, and detectives spent 36 hours straight interviewing the seven men and women. “We had to keep going back and forth and catch them in lies,” said Spurling. “It was a never-ending circle of lies.”

Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They’d squeezed the victim’s testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge’s sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird.”

***

But there was another moment, on our second day together, when she slipped verbally, and said in an almost irritable way, “He [the victim] was going to die anyway, so . . .” and then she caught herself. I just looked at her. All her previous protestations that when arrested she’d had no idea Vigliarole was dead were clearly lies.

But, still she is a victim

Of course, to the Left it does not matter what she did. It only matters that she is a devoted Marxist, and hey, what is a murder when compared to the “struggle” right? After all, she is a victim Prepare for your obligatory moral relativism from the left

The principles behind the Women’s March, things like equal rights and ending violence against women, don’t just matter to women. Women aren’t the only people capable of speaking on the subject, but Hylton brings something very interesting to the table. As Hylton very clearly explains on her website, she’s a women’s rights activist and criminal justice reform advocate. She is a woman. She is black. She was also the victim of abuse as a child and spent a long time in prison after committing a heinous crime.

Hylton’s life experiences are relevant to her causes. A white guy who’s never been to prison might be able to give a great talk about violence against women and inequality, but there’s an understandable draw to hearing about violence and discrimination against women from someone who’s experienced both. There’s an understandable draw to hearing about what happens to black women in the criminal justice system from a black woman who’s been through the criminal justice system. Hylton’s background doesn’t make her positions are any more valid, but even if her conclusions based on her life experiences are dead wrong, her perspective is colored by a very unique and very germane set of life experiences. Her views are worth hearing.

The reasoning in the blog post is dangerous for numerous reasons. Attacking something as huge and diverse as feminism in general or some imagined “Women’s Movement” represented by a single march because of the background of one person involved is the sort of thing that only succeeds with the stupidest among us. To say that such a movement is embracing someone simply by having her speak is misleading.

The point here is that no one who organized, or who is glorifying the “Women’s March” should have welcomed a murderer and kidnapper. The point is that Leftists accuse Trump, and Republicans of being sexist, Homophobic, and so on. They cast these allegations around without a second thought. Yet, they welcome a truly horrible person to join their movement. A person that not only did evil deeds, but actually uses her just punishment to scream about being a victim. In short, the truth is this. No movement can control all of those who attend their events, but they CAN control who they elevate in that movement. They can control who they give prominent positions to.

So, yes, this does say a lot about the Left, and Feminists which are part of the Left. In short, it illustrates that the Left does not value decency, or truth. All that matters to them is a person’s position on issues. To them, Donna Hylton is moral because she holds far left ideals. It does not matter that she took part in awful crimes. Hylton is embraced. Embraced while women who are pro-life, are shunned. Welcomed while any woman who voted for Trump is mocked and demonized. Hylton is praised while women who dare embrace Conservatism, in any way, are raked through the mud.

Stacy McCain ofers this excellent take

All who claim that feminism is about “equality” are either fools are liars. Feminists themselves have made clear that there is no limit to their demands. Give feminists everything they demand today, and tomorrow they will return with a new list of demands. Feminists are totalitarians with a remorseless appetite for power. Feminists are cruel and dishonest, and will tell any lie necessary to achieve their wicked purposes.

The Women’s March on Washington was a vivid expression of how Democrats have harnessed this hate movement for partisan purposes:

Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.

That a criminal psychopath was a leader of this feminist rally — and no one in the liberal media even mentioned her record of hateful violence — tells you a lot about the feminist movement and its ideology. Donna Hylton is not an isolated example, but is altogether typical of the kind of mentally deranged sadists that this movement attracts.

This is what happens when values cease to matter

Feminists: The New Prudes

It seems Feminists wish to be the wardrobe Police

In the fall, actress Karen Gillan came under fire for her skimpy outfit in the upcoming Jumanji movie, in which she stars alongside Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Jack Black and Kevin Hart. Now, Gillan is explaining why the outfit actually makes perfect sense.

When Johnson posted the first promotional image of the classic film reboot on social media in September, fans loved the outfits worn by the male cast—and especially Johnson’s tight-fitting shirt and khakis. They were less enthused by Gillan’s midriff-baring crop-top that showed off her physique. Her cargo shorts, they argued, exposed far too much of her legs.

Well, again we see that Feminists wish to empower women to make ONLY choices approved by Feminists. And, again, we see that a big issue here is that Feminists are afraid men will like the outfit. Feminists hate seeing men have fun

Feminists were outraged about how her character’s outfit catered to the “male gaze,” with some even calling it “sexist” and “outdated.” Perhaps they would have liked to measure the length of the exposed skin on her legs with a tape measure to determine if she was “decent.”

Just another example of how the Left is bound and determined to have control of everything everyone does.

Ladies, when the Left Shrieks about empowering you………..

…..what they really desire is to enslave you to a lifetime of government dependence

As you surely know by now, dozens of hardcore leftist organizations participated in a march on Washington to push for all sorts of leftist ideas, like abortion, ‘climate change’, vaginas, pussy’s, flipping people off while grabbing their vaginas, wearing pussy hats telling us they’re empowered (hey, that’s what most of the photos I saw seemed to be pushing). The NY Times has a wonderful collage of photos which conveniently forget most of the Crazy.

Yes, feminists are obsessed with their “lady parts” and with being empowered. Yet, all of that empowerment seems to revolve around having the government pay for the pads, tampons, abortions, birth control. Does anyone else think this odd? Certainly not Leftists like New York Andrew Cuomo, who is all happy to provide the government shackles ladies.

“These regulatory actions will help ensure that whatever happens at the federal level, women in our state will have cost-free access to reproductive health care and we hope these actions serve as a model for equality across the nation,” Cuomo said. “Women deserve to make a fair wage and the same salary as any man, they deserve to work in an office free of sexual harassment, they deserve comprehensive paid family leave, and they deserve control over their health and reproductive decisions.”

Oh Governor Cuomo you lying Leftist you. You, and anyone who thinks about this knows that this has nothing to do with women’s right, or empowerment. In the real world, the more “rights” the government invents, the more it ultimately controls those it “gives” those rights to. The more government provides, the more it controls, and, of course, in Andrew Cuomo’s world that is the goal.

In fact the goal of the Left is always control, it is at the very core of their Collectivist hearts. That is why they focus so much energy into propagandizing Americans into identity based group think. When those groups fall for that re-education, they also fall for the lie that only big government can protect their “rights”, and that thinking as an individual is bad. You must sacrifice your individual identity, and embrace your “identity” as a member of your “group”. Of course, those who are wise reject this notion for what it is, an invitation into slavery to the State.

Here is a great truth you must never forget. Once you willingly sacrifice your individual liberties, you lose every natural right that you possess. That reassuring sound for those that give in to group think is not security, or liberty.

woman-in-jail

It is, instead, the sound of the Collectivist jail cell door closing behind you.

Yeah, Ashley Judd is a crazy as a pet coon

Here you go folks. Proof that Leftism is an ideology for the delusional, bitter, and ignorant

Good Freaking Grief! Is there anything the Left loves more than pretending to be a victim?

Marxist Moron of the Day? Heck, after that incoherent rant, she might be the Marxist Moron of the Decade

Mike Miles has a asks Ashley Judd to imagine

1ninetymileszzxf41tb3eifo1_1280

Noted Lunatic Feminist: White bitches better know their place

Stacy McCain lays bare the lunacy, and Misogyny

A bestselling feminist author told a national conference that “dismantling patriarchy” requires that women must stop listening to white men.

“We have to get white women in order,” Roxane Gay said Friday at the Facing Race conference in Atlanta. “Until women are less invested in what white men think, we aren’t dismantling patriarchy.”

A professor of English at Purdue University, Gay is the author of Bad Feminist, a 2014 New York Times bestseller that is assigned reading in many university Women’s Studies programs. She was a keynote speaker at the Facing Race conference, organized by an anti-white group called Race Forward: The Center for Racial Justice Innovation. The organization’s partisan nature was revealed in a Nov. 9 statement responding to Donald Trump’s election by calling it “the worst outcome we could have imagined . . . a stunning victory for racism, misogyny, homophobia, and vengeful authoritarianism.”

How ironic! The biggest abusers of women are Feminists. They are no better than the sterotypical drunk in a wife beater tank top are they?