Category: batshit crazy

Is it just me, or is Jennifer Rubin nuclear grade crazy?

Consider her tweets

Actually, no, it will not, in any way

Oh good grief, sounds like Rubin is drunk tweeting

How would you “prove” someone was drunk 36 years ago? I mean we can prove Rubin is obsessed right now. We can prove whatever money she spent in journalism school was wasted………

Why does Rubin hate old people? And men? And White people? Why is she launching a misogynist smear campaign against this female prosecutor?

Then, there is this bit of idiocy. Rubin blasts Kavanaugh for denying accusations against him? What would this knuckle-dragger prefer Kavanaugh do? Confess even if innocent?

President Trump’s modus operandi in cases in which he or others are accused of sexual assault or harassment is “deny, deny, deny,” Bob Woodward reported in his new book “Fear.” As a dutiful and increasingly political appointee following Trump’s advice, Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh has taken this to an extreme.

So, denying something that is untrue is wrong now?

He denies knowing research psychologist Christine Blasey Ford as a teenager or repeatedly drinking to excess. (Just a few beers, declared the Georgetown Prep alumni whose yearbook was filled with drinking references.) Since age 14 (!) he has fought for women, says the man who listed himself in his high school yearbook as a “Renate Alumnius” (along with a dozen other boys), which appears to be an innuendo suggesting that he had sex with this girl. (His excuse that he identified himself as a “Renate Alumni” because they once went on a date and kissed — she denies the kiss — is undercut by all the other boys who used the same obnoxious reference.) The fighter for feminism since he was a teen nevertheless joined a Yale fraternity infamous for its misogynistic chant. His self-image doesn’t match other available evidence.

In other words Kavanaugh might have done what many, many teenage boys do? Interesting

None of the actions themselves would be grounds for disqualifying Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. A simple acknowledgement –“I’m embarrassed what a jerk I was in my teens” — would have gone such a long way in reaffirming his credibility and decency. That was not the road he chose. The danger here is that readily available evidence contradicting these remarkable assertions will undermine his credibility and disqualify him for the Supreme Court.

Well, most teens, male and female are jerks, teens are famous for being jerks. And most of us outgrow that, Rubin may even outgrow it one day too, who knows.

We’ve already seen a pattern of, shall we say, excessive denial in his testimony under oath.

Please go read the rest. Rubin is unhinged, and her scribblings might be funny if they were not so moronic. 

*AUDIO* Mark Steyn: Syphilis, Transgender Waxing, And Emotional Support Hedgehogs

.

.

The Left declares war on biology, science, gender……………

Via The Other McCain

The latest madness from academia:

Washington State University is currently offering a class on how Western science is impacted by “socially constructed” categories such as gender, sexuality, and nationality.
Women’s Studies 220: Gender, Culture, and Science,” is a sophomore-level class taught this semester by Jenifer Barclay, an assistant professor in the school’s Department of Critical Culture, Gender, and Race Studies.
In a copy of the syllabus obtained by Campus ReformBarclay frames Western science as “socially constructed,” asking “How objective is objectivity? Who determines ‘the facts’ and what social, cultural, economic, and political forces influence those who do?”
The syllabus then goes on to inquire, “Are fields like science, technology, engineering and medicine always completely objective and free of any kind of bias?”
To answer that question, Barclay pledges to map the “rise of Western science and the ways that ideas about gender, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, and nationality shape(d) the production of knowledge…and many other seemingly ‘objective’ topics.”
Though the class has three seemingly separate learning objectives, all three of the goals ultimately circle back to how scientific knowledge is “constructed” or “produced.”
For example, one learning goal explains that by learning about the “construction of scientific knowledge, [this class] encourages students to think critically about the importance of contextualization and the meaning of ‘objectivity.’”
Students will also learn “how gender, race, ethnicity, class, and sexuality [have] influenced the production of scientific knowledge in different historical eras and what the concrete consequences of this trajectory are,” the syllabus adds.

Soooo, the Left hates evolution now because……………

Fritz looks at insanity

Have We Reached Peak SJW Yet? It’s hard to imagine we haven’t, but life is full of surprises.

Stacy has one of his weekly anti-feminist rants. I kind of let them go by because, well, they just don’t move me that much, but in the middle of this one I found:

1111

111

Good  Freaking Grief! Fritz notes that this woman is, well, scientifically speaking bat shit crazy

Permit me to speak on behalf of the Sane Community in declaring that the person asking this question is deranged, demented, delusional, bonkers, wacky, off her rocker, and cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.

In short, she is crazy, and it is a waste of time to offer rational arguments in reply to craziness. We do a disservice to the mentally ill when we act as if their delusions deserve to be taken seriously, except as symptoms of their psychiatric pathology, yet this questioner on Quora received a serious reply from Anna Hardin, who recently received her Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of Minnesota:

Because science is just a set of methods we use to observe and report what is happening around us, scientists will not replace the theory of evolution unless another theory that better explains the change we observe in living things is better supported by the evidence. Evolution is well supported and has been for almost 200 years of scientific research, so it is unlikely that a better theory can be discovered.

Now science,evolution, math, and everything else is demonized by sme facet of Leftism. Seems everything, except maybe ice cream is EVIL! But give them time and they will get triggered over ice cream too.

So, an all women’s college forbids calling women women?

Good Freaking Grief!

Students at Mount Holyoke College are urged to update their copies of the Newspeak Dictionary. The all-women’s school forbids the word “women”:

The Supporting Trans and Non-Binary Students guide was created by officials at the college, which touts its legacy as an all-women’s college, in an effort to promote a “gender neutral” classroom environment.

“When discussing the student body, say ‘Mount Holyoke students’ rather than ‘Mount Holyoke women,’” it instructs professors. “Avoid making statements like ‘We’re all women here…’, or referring to ‘…the two genders…’”

Stupidity, wrapped in ignorance, battered in idiocy and deep fried in boiling hot moron oil!