Your wisdom of the day

Via Animal, who sums up the simplicity of wisdom while discussing Colorados ongoing persecution of one baker. 

You know, it’s illustrative to reverse the roles here.  Imagine an LGBTQX baker that refused to make a custom cake for a traditional heterosexual couple’s wedding.  Would the state of Colorado descend on them with the same fury they have visited on Phillips? Of course not!  And in that case, as opposed to Mr. Phillips’ case, the state would be correct; it is a clear violation of freedom of association to force a private business to enter into an agreement that violates their personal sense of ethics.

It doesn’t matter what their ethics system is based on:  The Bible, the Kama Sutra, the Books of Bokonon or the rantings of a street-corner drunk.  The state only has two legitimate purposes:  To protect the safety and the liberty of the citizen.  In this case, nobody’s safety or liberty was threatened by being denied a custom cake – except, of course, the liberty of Mr. Phillips, in the sense that the state attempted to deny him freedom of association.

“But Animal,” you might ask, “where do we draw the line?  Should a baker be allowed to refuse to provide a custom cake to a mixed-race couple, because he’s a (actual, as opposed to the usual, modern definition) racist?

“Yes,” I would reply, “…because bigoted pricks still have freedom of association.  No victim, no crime.  I may join you in a protest in front of that guy’s shop to deprive the bigoted prick of customers, but I’ll never say he isn’t within his rights to refuse – and there are plenty more bakers in Denver.”

The entire discussion should stop right there.  No victim, no crime.

I will note that I have heard two people, just two make these points. One is Animal, and the other me. Have you ever heard talk of freedom of association on this anywhere? Ever heard any of the talking heads on news shows make these very simple arguments? Arguments that, by the way, make absolute sense by following simple truths? Some people confuse wisdom with education. And, of course many educated people are wise. But the two are not the same. So few people today possess wisdom. And that is a major problem for our nation. God bless Animal and those others who can say more in just a few sentences than most talking heads can say in a year’s worth of talking points.

2 thoughts on “Your wisdom of the day”

  1. Quite agree but, but, but, alas, I do have a ya but…

    Yes freedom of association, however merchants are selling a product, not arbitrators of social justice. If a queer comes in to a fundamental Christian’s bake shop, wants to buy an off the shelf cake, he otta be able to buy it irregardless of his creed, color or sexual proclivities.

    If he want’s a demented product made to order, that’s another story.

    Merchants are merchants, period. It’s wrong for paypal to not let me pass my money through them to a gun dealer. It’s wrong for Patreon to kick people off for being conservative. It’s just wrong for MasterCard to refuse service to any legal business. It’s wrong that GAB can only receive money via check or bitcoin.

    I agree with freedom of association and the right of a merchant to post ‘no shirt, no shoes, no service’ signs, however when MasterCard, Visa, et al, can, based on their belief as to what is morally acceptable, exclude people from access to the marketplace, to negate their ability to pursue transactions that are legal, there’s where my ya but comes in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s