Imagine lawfully owning something, only to have the government decide you can’t be trusted with that same item. You can’t be trusted, they say, because some dipstick on the other side of the country decided to use a similar item illegally and horribly. Because he was of a similar age to you, you can no longer have that item.
You’d be pissed, right? You’d be furious. More importantly, you’d have every right to be.
Now, make this item a gun–something ownership of which is protected by the United States Constitution–and you’ve got a nice summation of the bill recently passed in Illinois.
As different states are looking at their gun laws in the aftermath of mass shootings, the Illinois State House and Senate passed a bill in late February that would require 18- to 20-year-olds to turn in their “assault rifles” within 90 days.
The Associated Press reports Democratic Rep. Michelle Mussman sponsored the bill, and it passed in the House 64-51.
If signed into law, it will prohibit people under 21 years old from buying or possessing “assault rifles,” high-capacity magazines, and .50-caliber rifles.
“There’s always the debate about whether or not it’s appropriate to have a discussion in the heat of the moment,” Mussman said on the House floor. “But I think that what we are seeing right now is a demand from the public that we stop kicking this down the road. That we actually do something about this.”
Oh yes, you are “doing something” alright. Nothing that will resuly in any worthwile goal of course. Nothing that will deter any crime
If there is an upside to this, it’s that officials say the plan isn’t to go door to door looking for guns. However, anyone age 18- to 20-years-old in possession of a banned firearm will be charged with a misdemeanor.
As if that makes everything all better.
I cannot really imagine such a law standing, but the troubling thing is bills like this do not permanently go away. They keep coming back, over and again. The politicians, disgraces to their offices will never stopin their pursuit to take guns away from the law-abiding. It is just what they do. They cannot be trusted to stop at one law, or to stop if a law is not passed or is stricken by a judge. These statists are relentless, so the only answer is to be eternally vigilant