Boston Marathon Bombing Victims Denied Insurance Reimbursement Because Event ‘Not An Act Of Terrorism’

Boston Marathon Victims Denied Insurance Reimbursement Because Bombing Was ‘Not Act Of Terrorism’ – Independent Journal Review


Were you under the assumption that the Boston Marathon bombings were an act of terrorism? Maybe it was because just after the bombings, the President said this:

“Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terror.”

Turns out, if you look into the details, he actually never said it was an act of terrorism. There was much discussion about the whys and wherefores after his statement, and the mincing of the difference between the words “terror” and “terrorism” went on for quite some time.

Now, the Treasury Department has given its imprint on the perspective as well. And they haven’t “certified” it as an “act of terrorism,” either.

The context is the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which was passed just after the 9/11 attacks. It’s a federally-administered and underwritten insurance program for terrorism-caused damage, designed to be relatively inexpensive but to compensate policy owners in the event of a man-caused disaster.

Twenty-two Boston-based companies carried that insurance and for pay-out purposes, the attacks have not been classified as acts of terror.

Instead, the law’s details state that insurance losses must exceed $5 million to be certified as terrorism, and so far only $1.9 million in claims have been issued. That actual terrorists blew stuff up, killed people, and caused damage is only part of the equation and not sufficient to make an “act of terrorism” determination. The rest of the critical factors depend on the dollar value.

Whether this detail stems from a crony relationship between the government and the insurance companies, as they write the policies and benefit from the premiums whereas the payouts are taxpayer supported, or just a well-intentioned mistake, is unclear.

Yet the FBI defines terrorism as activities that:

* “Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;”

* “Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and”

* “Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.”

By this definition, the Boston Marathon bombings were unquestionably a terrorist act, and the policy holders should receive the amounts due them. Regardless of whether or not the Treasury Department’s intentions are good, this is a grievous error that must be immediately corrected.

Editor’s note: This article was edited after publication to clarify what kind of federal program it is.



2 thoughts on “Boston Marathon Bombing Victims Denied Insurance Reimbursement Because Event ‘Not An Act Of Terrorism’”

  1. That’s ridiculous, after all that hurt that was caused last year, the victims don’t get nothing? This is not how I expected it to turn out. Those bombings were an act of terrorism, and the victims should have been allowed to have insurance reinbursement.

    This is making me furious, because those poor victims are being treated like they’re nothing, after they were seriously hurt or killed.

    The victims deserve insurance reimbursement after what happened, because they were doing the right thing in taking part in the marathon, only to be denied insurance reimbursement after the bombings in Boston.

  2. Reblogged this on Femininican and commented:
    Of course, and the islamic jihad massacre at Fort Hood was generic “workplace violence”, and the beltway sniper islamic jihad attacks were “random acts of violence” (by muslims, for islam), and the jihad shooting at the recruiting office in Arkansas wasn’t terrorism (except that it was), and the would be Times Square islamic jihad terror bombing had nothing to do with islam, and the ISLAMIC STATE is not comprised 100% of muslims who are waging jihad for islam, and “islam is a religion of peace”, and I’m the Queen of Ireland.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s