GOP establishment heartache Daniels is out, Cain is rolling,

And Stacy McCain, and Ed and I could not be happier about this. As McCain points out, the same old, same old Diminished Expectations of the Republican Party are in panic mode

Mitch Daniels’s overnight decision against a presidential bid will immediately raise the volume on the low-hum grumbling among Republican insiders that they’re gearing up to face President Obama with the weakest primary field in recent memory.

The pressure on a handful of Republicans who’ve insisted they won’t consider running but would be potentially strong alternatives to Mitt Romney will now significantly intensify, but the ultimate beneficiaries of Daniels’s absence may be two candidates already on course to run: Tim Pawlenty and Jon Huntsman.

At the moment, though, the Indiana governor’s exit illustrates the degree to which the GOP race is being shaped by who’s not running.

Ah yes, the same tools that told us we BETTER support Charile Crist over Marco Rubio if we were good Republicans are still stuck on stupid. Why is it I wonder, are they so afraid to look at a rising star who talks straight, answers questions directly, and who has the support of the Conservative base, solid business experience, and charisma to boot? Why are they afraid to Raise Cain?

Herman Cain said that if he were president and negotiating a Middle East peace deal, he would offer the Palestinians “nothing.”

“I’m not convinced the Palestinians are really interested in peace,” Cain, the former CEO of Godfathers Pizza, said on Fox News Sunday.

President Obama last week gave a speech calling for Israel to withdraw to pre-1967 boundaries, with “mutually agreed swaps.”

Cain, who formally announced his Republican candidacy for president Saturday, said that, “if we look at history, it has been clear that the Palestinians have always wanted to push the Israelis and push Israel for more and more and more.” I don’t agree with that, and I respect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or taking a stand and saying they cannot give that up.”

He also said “it’s Israel’s decision, not President Obama’s decision as to where those border lines ought to be.”

So, we are supposed to ignore Cain, or Bachman, in favor of the “Moderate, oh-so-electable” Republican re-tread that the “establishment tells us to get gaga over? Stacy McCain has the right thought about that

The discomfiture of “Republican insiders” is a very good thing. Can we get a show of hands of anybody who thinks “Republican insiders” (you know, the guys who backed Dede Scozzafava and Charlie Crist) have a clue as to how to win elections? Anybody?

I keep saying this election is different, American voters are not looking for an established politician, they are looking for someone who is NOT a life-long politician.

3 thoughts on “GOP establishment heartache Daniels is out, Cain is rolling,”

  1. You’re damning Daniels too much. He put Indiana on the fiscal straight and narrow, which is a very conservative thing to do.

    To go against anyone “the establishment” is for is to commit a logical fallacy.

    The establishment seems to focus in on what it perceives to be electability, at the expense of all else. If we had a really good conservative candidate who also appeared electable to them (for example, Jim DeMint), their endorsement of him would not diminish him. They would, like the blind squirrel, get it right for once.

  2. Excellent point, I did not necessarily mean to bash Daniels, so much as to point out that the GOP establishment is ignoring other worthy candidates, as they did with Rubio.
    I also agree that an “established Republican” like say, Perry would get my eager support, he is, like Cain, Bachman, etc. a Tea Party favorite.

  3. Don’t ya just love how the intellectual elite within the GOP feel they have the right to decide for the rest of us who is electable and who isn’t? Of course, just by saying that someone like Cain is unelectable, they engage in a potentially self-fulfilling prophesy… that’s assuming they really want a genuine conservative to win in the first place but honestly believe he can’t. I suspect that most of these egg-headed pundits would much rather see a McCain-like presidency than a Cain-like one. After all, if they’re so smart, certainly they have to recognize that repeatedly saying the most conservative candidates have no chance of winning is the surest way of guaranteeing they’ll fail. If you ask me, folks like Charles Krauthammer may be highly educated and well versed in political policy, but they’re either really stupid when it comes to promoting their own party during critical elections, or they’re complete sell-outs. Either way, I have exactly ZERO use for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s